首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Thromboprophylaxis patterns,risk factors,and outcomes of care in the medically ill patient population
Authors:Charles E. Mahan  Maxine D. Fisher  Roger M. Mills  Larry E. Fields  Judith J. Stephenson  An-Chen Fu  Alex C. Spyropoulos
Affiliation:1. Presbyterian Healthcare Services, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA;2. HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA;3. Janssen Research and Development, Raritan-Titusville, NJ, USA;4. Janssen Scientific Affairs, Raritan, NJ, USA;5. North Shore/LIJ Health System at Lenox Hill Hospital; Hofstra University School of Medicine NY, NY, USA
Abstract:

Introduction

Medically ill, hospitalized patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after discharge. This study aimed to examine thromboprophylaxis patterns, risk factors, and post-discharge outcomes.

Methods

This was a retrospective claims analysis involving administrative claims data and in-patient data abstracted from a sample of hospital charts. Patients aged ≥ 40 years hospitalized for ≥ 2 days for nonsurgical reasons between 2005 and 2009 were included. Hospital chart data were abstracted for a random sample of patients without evidence of anticoagulant use at 30 days post-discharge. The combined data determined whether in-patient thromboprophylaxis (anticoagulant or mechanical prophylaxis) reduces risk of VTE at 90 days post-discharge. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression.

Results

Of 141,628 patients in the claims analysis, 3.9% received anticoagulants (3.6% warfarin). VTE, rehospitalization, and mortality rates were 1.9%, 17.2%, and 6.2%, respectively. The strongest predictors of post-discharge VTE were history of VTE (HR = 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3-4.8), and rehospitalization (HR = 3.9, 95% CI: 3.6-4.3). Of 504 medical charts, 209 (41.5%) reported in-patient thromboprophylaxis. There was no statistically significant difference in post-discharge VTE rates between patients who did and did not receive in-patient thromboprophylaxis. All-cause mortality was greater among patients without use of VTE prophylaxis.

Conclusion

Utilization rates of in-hospital and post-discharge VTE prophylaxis were low. In-hospital VTE prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of post-discharge VTE in the absence of post-discharge anticoagulation. Combined in-patient and post-discharge thromboprophylaxis lowered the odds of short-term, all-cause post-discharge mortality.
Keywords:CI, confidence interval   DCI, Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index   DVT, deep vein thrombosis   HIRD, HealthCore Integrated Research Database   HR, hazard ratio   ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification   LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin   OR, odds ratio   PE, pulmonary embolism   SD, standard deviation   VTE, venous thromboembolism
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号