Importance of recurrence rating,morphology, hernial gap size,and risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia classification

Background

There is limited evidence on the natural course of ventral and incisional hernias and the results of hernia repair, what might partially be explained by the lack of an accepted classification system. The aim of the present study is to investigate the association of the criteria included in the Wuerzburg classification system of ventral and incisional hernias with postoperative complications and long-term recurrence.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort study, the data on 330 consecutive patients who underwent surgery to repair ventral and incisional hernias were analyzed. The following four classification criteria were applied: (a) recurrence rating (ventral, incisional or incisional recurrent); (b) morphology (location); (c) size of the hernial gap; and (d) risk factors. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a recurrence during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were incidence of postoperative complications. Independent association between classification criteria, type of surgical procedures and postoperative complications was calculated by multivariate logistic regression analysis and between classification criteria, type of surgical procedures and risk of long-term recurrence by Cox regression analysis.

Results

Follow-up lasted a mean 47.7 ± 23.53 months (median 45 months) or 3.9 ± 1.96 years. The criterion “recurrence rating” was found as predictive factor for postoperative complications in the multivariate analysis (OR 2.04; 95 % CI 1.09–3.84; incisional vs. ventral hernia). The criterion “morphology” had influence neither on the incidence of the critical event “recurrence during follow-up” nor on the incidence of postoperative complications. Hernial gap “width” predicted postoperative complications in the multivariate analysis (OR 1.98; 95 % CI 1.19–3.29; ≤5 vs. >5 cm). Length of the hernial gap was found to be an independent prognostic factor for the critical event “recurrence during follow-up” (HR 2.05; 95 % CI 1.25–3.37; ≤5 vs. >5 cm). The presence of 3 or more risk factors was a consistent predictor for “recurrence during follow-up” (HR 2.25; 95 % CI 1.28–9.92). Mesh repair was an independent protective factor for “recurrence during follow-up” compared to suture (HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.32–0.86).

Conclusions

The ventral and incisional hernia classification of Dietz et al. employs a clinically proven terminology and has an open classification structure. Hernial gap size and the number of risk factors are independent predictors for “recurrence during follow-up”, whereas recurrence rating and hernial gap size correlated significantly with the incidence of postoperative complications. We propose the application of these criteria for future clinical research, as larger patient numbers will be needed to refine the results.