首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Understanding solid-phase HLA antibody assays and the value of MFI
Authors:Harold C. Sullivan  Howard M. Gebel  Robert A. Bray
Affiliation:Emory University School of Medicine, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Room H183, 1364 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Abstract:As the practice of medicine becomes more reliant on imaging and laboratory tests, medical decisions will be increasingly based on numbers. Accordingly, following the introduction of solid-phase testing to the HLA testing repertoire, laboratory directors and physicians have employed preset mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) thresholds as the basis for decisions in the management of transplant patients. However, what do MFI values mean? The literature is rife with reports detailing numerous factors that influence antibody assessment including (but not limited to) sensitization history of the patient, level of mismatch between donor and recipient, presence of interfering substances in the serum, whether the antigen on multiplex beads is native or denatured, day-to-day and technologist variability, and the historical performance of an assay in a given institution. How are these variables incorporated into the interpretation of MFI values? Herein, the pitfalls and complexities of single antigen bead (SAB) testing and interpretation are discussed with specific attention to what can and cannot be inferred by MFI.
Keywords:MFI  mean fluorescence intensity  HLA  human leukocyte antigen  SAB  single antigen bead  DSA  donor-specific antibody  AMR  antibody mediated rejection  cPRA  calculated PRA  EDTA  Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid  DTT  Dithiothreitol  PE  phycoerythrin  CDC  complement-dependent cytotoxicity  CF  complement fixing  NCF  non-complement fixing  FCXM  flow cytometric crossmatch  HLA  SAB  MFI  Solid phase single antigen  C1q
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号