| 干、湿疗法治愈1178例面部烧伤的疗效分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王洪生,王洪,侯健,王文松.干、湿疗法治愈1178例面部烧伤的疗效分析[J].中国烧伤创疡杂志,2000(3):53-55. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王洪生 王洪 侯健 王文松 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国烧伤创疡科技中心,100053
2. 辽宁省大连市第四人民医院,116031 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的：比较ＭＥＢＴ／ＭＥＢＯ和干性暴露疗法对面部不同深度烧伤创面的疗效。方法：将采用ＭＥＢＴ／ＭＥＢＯ和干性暴露疗法治愈的１１７８例面部浅Ⅱ度、深Ⅲ度和Ⅲ烧度伤创面分为相应二组，比较二组的临床疗效并进行统计学分析。结果：与干性暴露组比较，ＭＦＢＴ／ＭＥＢＯ组治疗的面部浅Ⅱ度、深Ⅱ度和Ⅲ度伤创面愈合快，止痛效果好，疤痕增生不明显。结论：ＭＥＢＴ／ＭＥＢＯ对面部浅Ⅱ度、深Ⅱ度和Ⅲ度烧伤面的疗效优于干燥
|
| 关 键 词： | 面部 烧伤 湿性医疗技术 治疗 干燥暴露疗法 |
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Dry and Moist Therapy in Treating 1178 Cases of Facial Burn |
| |
| Wang Hongsheng,Wang Hong,Hou Jian,et al..Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Dry and Moist Therapy in Treating 1178 Cases of Facial Burn[J].The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers,2000(3):53-55. |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Hongsheng Wang Hong Hou Jian |
| |
| Institution: | Wang Hongsheng,Wang Hong,Hou Jian,et al.,China Science and Technology Center for Burns,Wounds and Ulcers 100053 [ |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective: To compare the efficacy of MEBT/MEBO and dry exposed burn therapy in treating facial burn of different depth. Method: 1178 cases of superficial second, deep second and third degree burn were divided into two groups. One group treated with MEBT/MEBO and the other treated with dry exposed therapy. The efficacy of the two groups was compared and the result analyzed statistically. Result: Compared with dry exposed therapy, MEBT/MEBO has better efficacy in treating facial superficial and deep second degree and third degree burn wounds, the wounds healed more quickly, pain was relieved and no scar formed. Conclusion: MEBT/MEBO is better than dry exposed therapy in treating facial superficial second, deep second and third degree burn. |
| |
| Keywords: | Face Burn wound MEBT/MEBO Dry exposed therapy Treatment |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
