首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

乳腺癌超声误诊原因分析
引用本文:谭威,谭铭戈.乳腺癌超声误诊原因分析[J].中国当代医药,2013(11):104-105.
作者姓名:谭威  谭铭戈
作者单位:[1]吉化集团总医院电诊科,吉林吉林132022 [2]北京密云县医院超声科,北京101500
摘    要:目的探讨乳腺癌超声误诊的原因。方法回顾性总结2010年1月~2012年11月在本院进行乳腺癌诊断的资料共计135例,所有资料在用超声方法进行诊断后,以实验室病理学检查结果进行确诊,统计学方法比较两种诊断结果的差异性,最后讨论分析误诊原因。结果超声影像学诊断结果确诊129例(确诊率为95.6%),漏诊3例(漏诊率为2.2%),1例误诊为纤维腺瘤,1例误诊为囊性增生,1例误诊为导管内乳头状瘤,统计学检验结果表明,超声诊断结果与病理学确诊结果差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论超声对于乳腺癌的确诊具有重要的临床意义。

关 键 词:乳腺癌  误诊  病理学检查  超声影像学

Misdiagnosis analysis of breast cancer ultrasonic
Authors:TAN Wei  TAN Mingge
Institution:1.Electric Diagnosis Department, the General Hospital of CNPC in Jilin City of Jilin Province, Jilin 132002, China; 2.Uhrasound Development, Beijing Miyun County Hospital, Beijing 101500, China)
Abstract:Objective To investigate the misdiagnosis causes of breast cancer ultrasound. Methods One hundred and thirty five cases with breast cancer in our hospital from January 2010 to November 2012 were diagnosed and retro- spectively analyzed. All the datum were diagnosed by ultrasonic method, used laboratory pathologic examination results for diagnosis, used statistical methods to compare the differences between the two diagnostic results, then analyzed the misdiagnosis causes. Results The ultrasound imaging diagnosis results had confirmed 129 cases (the diagnostic rate was 95.6%), 3 cases were missed (the missed diagnosis rate was 2.2%), 1 case was misdiagnosed as fibroadenoma, 1 case was misdiagnosed as cystic hyperplasia, 1 case was misdiagnosed as intraductal papilloma, the statistical test results showed that, the result of ultrasonography diagnosis and pathology had no significant difference (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound has an important clinical significance for breast cancer diagnosis.
Keywords:Breast cancer  Misdiagnosis  Pathological examination  Uhrasound imaging
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号