首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

三种方法预备下颌第二磨牙C形根管成形效果的比较
引用本文:周欣,马琦,尹兴喆,张成飞.三种方法预备下颌第二磨牙C形根管成形效果的比较[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2008,43(3):151-153.
作者姓名:周欣  马琦  尹兴喆  张成飞
作者单位:1. 北京大学第三医院口腔科,100083
2. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院特诊科,100081
摘    要:目的 评价3种常用根管预备方法对C形根管的成形效果,为临床治疗提供参考.方法 对临床拔除的具有C形根管的下颌第二恒磨牙60颗,应用改良Bramante技术,于距根尖2mm、5 mm和8mm处将牙根横断.选择手用不锈钢K锉逐步后退技术(Step-Back组)、逐步深入技术(Step-Down组)和机用旋转镍钛锉ProTaperTM系列冠向下预备技术(Crown-Down组)预备不同类型的C形根管,比较预备前后根管横截面形态的数码图像,对3种不同方法的成形效果进行评价.结果 3种方法预备离体下颌第二磨牙C形根管后均有遗漏.不锈钢K锉逐步后退技术和不锈钢K锉逐步深入技术分别在根冠部遗漏面积百分比分别为(0.177±0.071)%、(0.068±0.074)%]和根尖部遗漏面积百分比分别为(0.236±0.167)%、(0.295±0.171)%]遗漏较少(P<0.05).CⅠ、CⅡ型遗漏出现在近远中多于颊舌侧,将其分为独立的2~3个根管预备可减少遗漏.不同方法预备根尖区的遗漏均显著高于根管中上部(P<0.05).结论 早期开敞根管上段,将C形根管分为2~3个独立的根管进行预备,可以增进根管预备的成形效果.

关 键 词:牙髓腔  根管制备  牙科高速技术

Comparative study of shaping efficiency in C-shaped canals of mandibular second molars
ZHOU Xin,MA Qi,YIN Xing-zhe,ZHANG Cheng-fei.Comparative study of shaping efficiency in C-shaped canals of mandibular second molars[J].Chinese Journal of Stomatology,2008,43(3):151-153.
Authors:ZHOU Xin  MA Qi  YIN Xing-zhe  ZHANG Cheng-fei
Institution:Department of Special Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the shaping efficiency of three instrumentation techniques in the C-shaped canals. METHODS: Sixty extracted mandibular second molars with C-shaped canals were selected and cross-sectioned at 2, 5, 8 mm from the apex by using a muffle system as described by Bramante. The teeth containing C-shaped canals were randomly divided into three groups, respectively instrumented using stainless steel K-files in step-back and step-down techniques, and ProTaper series in crown-down technique. The digital images of canal cross-sections pre- and post-instrumentation were photographed to evaluate the proportion and position of uninstrumented area Working length loss and perforation were recorded. Data were analyzed using ANOVA. RESULTS: Step-down technique gained smaller uninstrumented area in the coronal third of the canals, while step-beck technique gained the same results in the apical third (P < 0.05). Uninstrumented proportion in apical part was significantly higher than in the middle and the coronal (P < 0.05). Instrumenting type I canal as 2 or 3 separated canals was likely to reduce the miss. There were three perforations in manual stainless steel K-file groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early opening the coronal part of C-shaped canal, shaping C-shaped canal as two or three separated canals and instrumenting the apical part with step-back technique, seemed to be the effective methods to avoid miss.
Keywords:Dental pulp cavity  Root canal preparation  Dental high-speed technique
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号