首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

胰脂肪酶、CRP及血淀粉酶联合相关肝功能指标检测诊断AP的临床应用研究
引用本文:徐刚,王辉.胰脂肪酶、CRP及血淀粉酶联合相关肝功能指标检测诊断AP的临床应用研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014(12):963-966.
作者姓名:徐刚  王辉
作者单位:[1]上海市宝山区大场医院检验科,上海200436 [2]上海执诚生物科技股份有限公司,上海201318
基金项目:上海市科学技术委员会科研项目(编号:11DZ1931500)
摘    要:目的研究分析胰脂肪酶(LPS)、C反应蛋白(CRP)及血淀粉酶(S-AMY)联合相关肝功能指标检测诊断急性胰腺炎(AP)的临床应用价值。方法将2013年1月至2013年12月收治的193例急腹症患者分为AP组106例和非AP组87例,其中AP组根据病因情况和病情严重程度分为胆源组(n=64)和非胆源组(n=42);轻症组(MAP,n=69)和重症组(SAP,n=37)。另外选择90例健康体检者作为对照组。检测患者的相关指标。结果 AP组的S-AMY水平显著高于非AP组和对照组,且非AP组较对照组水平高,各组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);AP组LPS指标也显著高于非AP组和对照组(P0.05),非AP组和对照组相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05);AP组和非AP组CRP水平较对照组高(P0.05);与MAP相比,SAP组CRP水平明显增高(P0.05),S-AMY和LPS两组相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05);肝功能指标检测发现,胆源性AP组TB、ALT、AST三者指标水平高于非胆源性AP组(P0.05);胆源性AP组DB水平高于非胆源性AP组,但两组差异无统计学意义(P0.05);血清LPS指标特异度90.5%,敏感度91.2%,高于S-AMY和CRP;S-AMY与LPS联合检测特异度94.1%,敏感度92.9%,高于单个指标的诊断结果。结论 S-AMY与LPS联合检测有助于AP的诊断,CRP则更适用于评估AP的严重程度,监测病情和预后情况;血清中TB、DB、AST、ALT等相关肝功能指标对于临床上区分胆源性AP和非胆源性AP上具有一定的参考价值,有利于提高胆源性AP的诊断。

关 键 词:急性胰腺炎  胰脂肪酶  CPR  血淀粉酶  肝功能指标

Clinical diagnostic research of pancreatic Hpase,CRP, serum amylase and Hver function detection in AP.
XU Gang,WANG Hui.Clinical diagnostic research of pancreatic Hpase,CRP, serum amylase and Hver function detection in AP.[J].Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine,2014(12):963-966.
Authors:XU Gang  WANG Hui
Institution:1 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Dachang Hospital of Baoshan Derict, Shanghai 200436, China ; 2 Shanghai Cheng Bio - Technology Co. , ltd. Executive, Shanghai 201318, China)
Abstract:Objective To explore the diagnostic significance of pancreatic lipase, CRP, serum amylase and liver function detection in A- cute panereatitis. Methods From January 2013 to December 2013 in our hospital, 193 acute abdomen cases were divided into AP group 106 ca- ses and non - AP group 87 cases, according to the cause and severity of the situation. The patients of AP group was divided into bile source group ( n = 64) and non - biliary source group ( n = 42 ) ; mild group ( MAP, n = 69 ) and severe group ( SAP, n = 37). Also we selected 90 healthy volunteers as a control group, to detect relevant indicators of the patient. Results S - AMY in AP group was significantly higher than non - AP group and the control group. The non - AP group was higher than the control group. The difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ) between the groups. LPS in AP group was also significantly higher than the non - AP group and the control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The non - AP group and the control group was not statistically significant ( P 〉 0.05 ). The CRP in AP group and non - group was higher than the control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with the MAP, CRP in SAP group was significantly higher ( P 〈 0.05 ). S - AMY and LPS from the two groups showed no significant difference ( P 〉 0.05 ). TB, ALT, AST in biliary AP group were higher than non - biliary AP group ( P 〈 0.05 ). DB in biliary AP group was higher than non - biliary AP group, but the difference was not statistically significance ( P 〉0.05). Specificity of LPS was 90.5%, and sensitivity was 91.2%, which were higher than the S -AMY and CRP. S -AMY and LPS joint detection specificity was 94. 1%, sensitivity was 92.9%, which was higher than the diagnostic accuracy of the individual indicators. Conclusion S - AMY and LPS joint detection can help diagnose the AP, CRP is more focused on the assessment of the severity of the AP, monitoring the condition and prognosis. Serum TB, DB, AST, ALT has some reference value for the clinical distinction between the biliary AP and non - biliary AP, which would help improve the diagnosis of biliary AP.
Keywords:Acute pancreatitis  Pancreatic lipase  CPR  Blood amylase  Liver function
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号