首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Detection of intracardiac masses in patients with coronary artery disease using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with transthoracic echocardiography
Authors:Wieland Staab  Leonard Bergau  Andreas Schuster  Rocio Hinojar  Marc Dorenkamp  Silvia Obenauer  Joachim Lotz  Christian Sohns
Affiliation:1. Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heart Center, University Medical Center G?ttingen, G?ttingen, Germany
6. DZHK, G?ttingen, Germany
7. Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Center of Radiology, University Medical Center G?ttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, G?ttingen, Germany
2. Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Heart Center, University Medical Center G?ttingen, G?ttingen, Germany
3. Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Imaging Department, King’s College London, London, UK
4. Department of Cardiology, Virchow Hospital, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
5. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
Abstract:We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for the detection of intracardiac masses and thrombus formation in patients with history of coronary artery disease (CAD) in comparison to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) under clinical routine conditions. 171 patients with history of CAD (89 male, aged 34–89 years, median 63 ± 11) underwent TTE and CMR during routine clinical examinations. TTE and CMR were independently analysed regarding the presence of intracardiac thrombus formation, masses and related size, dimensions, shape and signal characteristics. TTE depicted intracavitary thrombus formation in 40/171 patients (23.4 %) and intracardiac mass in 12/171 patients (7.0 %). All masses revealed in TTE were correctly detected on CMR and confirmed by histology. However, CMR showed 15 additional thrombi and 3 additional intracardiac masses (p = 0.001) that were not seen in TTE. Patients with poor systolic function (LVEF <30 %) had misleading results when referred to TTE (19 vs. 27 thrombi detected, p < 0.01). The detection of intracardiac masses or thrombi was not significantly different in patient with LVEF >30 %, whereas CMR was superior when the LVEF was <30 %. Routine TTE in patients with CAD leads to lower detection rates of intracardiac masses and thrombus formation in patients with severely impaired EF. Consequently we are missing a significant amount of clinically relevant diagnosis when only assessing patients with TTE. In patients with CAD and severely impaired LVEF, CMR should be considered as first line imaging tool to detect or rule out intracardiac masses and thrombi.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号