首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种液体复苏对失血性休克大鼠细菌移位及肠道炎症反应的影响
引用本文:高新跃,周强,吴长毅,庞庆丰,曹君利,曾因明. 两种液体复苏对失血性休克大鼠细菌移位及肠道炎症反应的影响[J]. 中国危重病急救医学, 2006, 18(3): 146-149,T0001
作者姓名:高新跃  周强  吴长毅  庞庆丰  曹君利  曾因明
作者单位:221002,徐州医学院江苏省麻醉学重点实验室,江苏省麻醉学研究所
基金项目:江苏省教育厅课题基金资助项目(KJS04002)
摘    要:目的探讨复方氯化钠溶液(林格液,RS)和质量分数为6%的中分子羟乙基淀粉溶液(HES)对失血性休克大鼠细菌移位及肠道炎症反应的影响。方法50只健康雄性SD大鼠按随机数字表法分为假手术组(SHA组,n=10)、RS组n=20)、HES组(n=20),RS组和HES组制备可控性失血性休克模型。分别于液体复苏后1h和24h处死大鼠,检测和比较各组大鼠细菌移位、肠组织肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF—α)及髓过氧化物酶(MPO)活性的变化,并进行病理学检查。结果HES组和RS组在死亡率、放血量、病理学检查方面没有明显差别。与SHA组比较,HES组和RS组在菌落计数和TNF—α方面明显升高,其中HES1h组比RS1h组明显升高,HES 24h组比RS24h组明显下降。与SHA组比较,HES1h组和RS1h组的MPO活性明显升高,HES24h组和RS24h组MP0活性没有明显差别。结论RS能明显改善复苏后1h的肠道功能,HES能明显改善复苏后24h的肠道功能。

关 键 词:休克  失血性 液体复苏 细菌移位 炎症反应 肠黏膜屏障
收稿时间:2005-10-22
修稿时间:2005-10-222006-02-11

Comparison of effects of two kinds of fluid for resuscitation on bacterial translocation and inflammation of small intestine in rats with hemorrhagic shock
GAO Xin-yue,ZHOU Qiang,WU Chang-yi,PANG Qing-feng,CAO Jun-li,ZENG Yin-ming. Comparison of effects of two kinds of fluid for resuscitation on bacterial translocation and inflammation of small intestine in rats with hemorrhagic shock[J]. Chinese critical care medicine, 2006, 18(3): 146-149,T0001
Authors:GAO Xin-yue  ZHOU Qiang  WU Chang-yi  PANG Qing-feng  CAO Jun-li  ZENG Yin-ming
Affiliation:The Key Lab of Anesthesiology of Jiangsu Province, The Anesthesiology Institute of Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou 221002, Jiangsu, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Ringer's solution (RS) or 6% hydroxyethyl saline (HES) on bacterial translocation and inflammation of the small intestine in rats with hemorrhagic shock. METHODS: Fifty healthy male SD rats were randomly divided into the sham group (SHA group, n=10), the Ringer's solution group (RS group, n=20) and 6% hydroxyethyl saline group (HES group, n=20). Controlled hemorrhagic shock model was reproduced in RS and HES groups. Bacterial translocation to the liver, the content of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in intestinal tissue, and the myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in the intestinal tissue were determined and compared among the groups, and the pathologic changes in the small intestine were observed. RESULTS: The mortality rate, bleeding volume and Chiu's scores were same in HES and RS groups (all P>0.05). Compared to SHA group, bacterial count and TNF-alpha level were increased significantly in HES and RS groups, and they were higher at 1 hour and lower at 24 hours in HES group than those in RS group. Compared to the SHA group, MPO activity increased at 1 hour in RS and HES groups, but no significant difference between the groups was found at 24 hours. CONCLUSION: RS prevents compromise of the intestinal barrier function better than the HES at 1 hour after fluid resuscitation. However, HES seems to be better in protecting the intestinal barrier function compared with RS at 24 hours after fluid resuscitation.
Keywords:hemorrhagic shock   fluid resuscitation   bacterial translocation  inflammation   intestinal mucosa barrier
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号