首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

对比观察SWI与常规T1WI、T2WI、T2*WI显示肝硬化铁沉积结节的价值
引用本文:陶冉,张久权,崔进国,王健. 对比观察SWI与常规T1WI、T2WI、T2*WI显示肝硬化铁沉积结节的价值[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2012, 28(5): 957-960
作者姓名:陶冉  张久权  崔进国  王健
作者单位:1. 中国人民解放军白求恩国际和平医院放射科,河北石家庄,050082
2. 第三军医大学西南医院放射科,重庆,400038
摘    要:目的评价SWI对肝硬化铁结节(SN)的检出率及其图像质量和检出结节数量,并与常规T1WI、T2WI、T2*WI对比。方法 128例肝硬化患者接受MR T1WI、T2WI、T2*WI和SWI。2名高年资放射科医师在SPIN图像处理软件上分别计算并比较4种图像上的SN检出率、SN与周围肝实质的信号强度比(SIR)、CNR,并计算SN的数量。结果 MR T1WI、T2WI、T2*WI和SWI的SN检出率分别为12.50%(16/128)、24.22%(31/128)、41.41%(53/128)和62.50%(80/128),SIR分别为0.85±0.16、0.58±0.17、0.50±0.20和0.36±0.21,CNR分别为9.15±5.79、9.77±5.49、11.49±4.57和13.93±5.64,SN的数量分别为(2.56±1.39)个/例、(16.27±12.32)个/例、(42.95±28.32)个/例和(72.31±62.99)个/例。SWI对SN的检出率明显高于T1WI、T2WI、T2*WI(χ2=26.86,P<0.05),SWI的SIR和CNR明显优于T1WI、T2WI、T2*WI(P均<0.05),SWI检出的SN数量明显多于T1WI、T2WI、T2*WI(P均<0.05)。结论 SWI在图像质量和SN的检出率以及检出数量上优于常规T1WI、T2WI和T2*WI,是检查肝硬化患者SN最敏感的方法,也是常规MR扫描的有益补充。

关 键 词:磁敏感加权成像  磁共振成像  铁沉积结节  信号强度比  对比噪声比
收稿时间:2011-11-11
修稿时间:2012-01-20

Comparison of SWI with T1WI, T2WI and T2*WI in detecting liver siderotic nodules in patients with liver cirrhosis
TAO Ran,ZHANG Jiu-quan,CUI Jin-guo and WANG Jian. Comparison of SWI with T1WI, T2WI and T2*WI in detecting liver siderotic nodules in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology, 2012, 28(5): 957-960
Authors:TAO Ran  ZHANG Jiu-quan  CUI Jin-guo  WANG Jian
Affiliation:Department of Radiology, Bethune International Peace Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Shijiazhuang 050082, China;Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China;Department of Radiology, Bethune International Peace Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Shijiazhuang 050082, China;Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the diagnostic performance of SWI for detecting siderotic nodules(SN) in patients with liver cirrhosis,and to compare SWI with T1WI,T2WI and T2*WI.Methods A total of 128 patients with chronic liver cirrhosis underwent MR T1WI,T2WI,T2*WI and SWI.The detection rate and number of SN,signal intensity ratio(SIR),and CNR were evaluated by two senior radiologists independently on SPIN software and were compared with T1WI,T2WI,T2*WI and SWI.Results The detection rate of SN with SWI(80/128,62.50%) was higher than that with MR T1WI(16/128,12.50%),T2WI(31/128,24.22%),T2*WI(53/128,41.41%)(χ2=26.86,P<0.05),respectively.SIR of SWI(0.36±0.21) was lower than that of T1WI(0.85±0.16),T2WI(0.58±0.17),T2*WI(0.50±0.20,P<0.05),respectively.CNR of SWI(13.93±5.64) was higher than that of T1WI(9.15±5.79),T2WI(9.77±5.49),T2*WI(11.49±4.57,all P<0.05),respectively.The number of SN with SWI(72.31±62.99) was higher than that with T1WI(2.56±1.39),T2WI(16.27±12.32),T2*WI(42.95±28.32,all P<0.05),respectively.Conclusion The imaging quality and detection rate for SN on SWI is higher than conventional MRI.SWI appears to provide the most sensitive method to detect SN in cirrhotic liver.It is a valuable complement to conventional liver MRI.
Keywords:Susceptibility weighted imaging  Magnetic resonance imaging  Siderotic nodules  Signal intensity ratio  Contrast noise ratio
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号