首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Prognostic factors affecting survival in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 110 patients
Authors:N Iqbal  N K Shukla  S V S Deo  S Agarwala  D N Sharma  M C Sharma  S Bakhshi
Institution:1.Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital,All India Institute of Medical Sciences,New Delhi,India;2.Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital,All India Institute of Medical Sciences,New Delhi,India;3.Department of Pediatric Surgery,All India Institute of Medical Sciences,New Delhi,India;4.Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital,All India Institute of Medical Sciences,New Delhi,India;5.Department of Pathology,All India Institute of Medical Sciences,New Delhi,India
Abstract:

Background

Data on treatment outcome and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are limited in the literature.

Methods

A total of 119 patients with metastatic STS treated between June 2003 and December 2012 were analyzed for treatment outcome and prognostic factors.

Results

Median age was 37 years (range 2–72 years) with a male to female ratio of 1.5:1. Most common histologic subtypes were synovial sarcoma (36 %) and leiomyosarcoma (16 %). Median tumor size was 12 cm (range 1.6–30 cm). Twenty-four (20 %) patients were treated with multimodality therapy and 80 % patients received systemic chemotherapy alone. At a median follow-up of 10 months (range 1–66 months), the 2-year EFS and OS were 10 and 19 %, respectively, with a median EFS and OS of 6 and 10 months, respectively. Univariate analysis identified albumin ≤4 g/dl (p = 0.001), histologic subtypes other than synovial sarcoma (p = 0.02), non-extremity tumors (p = 0.03) and single modality treatment (p = 0.03) as factors predicting poor EFS; however, for OS, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dl (p = 0.02), tumor size >10 cm (p = 0.01) and single modality treatment (p = 0.04) were identified as poor prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis identified only serum albumin ≤4 g/dl (p = 0.002, HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.29–0.75) associated with poor EFS; however, for OS, hemoglobin ≤10 g/dl (p = 0.009, HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.29–0.83), tumor size >10 cm (p = 0.003, HR 2.11, 95 % CI 1.28–3.47) and single modality treatment (p = 0.01, HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.25–0.86) emerged as poor prognostic factors.

Conclusions

Serum albumin, tumor size, hemoglobin and treatment modality affect survival in metastatic STS.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号