Clinical rejection is distinguished from subclinical rejection by increased infiltration by a population of activated macrophages. |
| |
Authors: | P C Grimm R McKenna P Nickerson M E Russell J Gough E Gospodarek B Liu J Jeffery D N Rush |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. pgrimm@ucsd.edu |
| |
Abstract: | It has been reported previously that one-third of protocol renal biopsies in asymptomatic, biochemically stable renal transplant recipients in the first 6 mo show unsuspected subclinical graft rejection (both infiltrate and tubulitis) and that subclinical rejection is a risk factor for chronic renal dysfunction. This study was performed to determine whether differences in phenotype or activation status of graft-infiltrating cells underlie these different manifestations of acute rejection. Biopsies with normal histology (n = 10), subclinical rejection (n = 13), and clinical rejection (n = 9) were studied using immunohistochemistry and computerized image analysis. Subclinical and clinical rejections had similar histologic Banff scores. Univariate analysis showed a trend for a higher infiltration with CD8+ (P = 0.053) and CD68+(P = 0.06) cells in clinical rejection. Of the activation markers studied (CD25, perforin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha), only allograft inflammatory factor-1+-activated macrophages were significantly (P = 0.014) increased in the infiltrate of clinical rejection biopsies. These data suggest that activated macrophages or their products are responsible for acute renal dysfunction associated with clinical rejection episodes. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|