| Abstract: | Five observers assessed the panoramic and full-mouth (14 periapical and four posterior bitewing) radiographs of 20 patients each for the ability to interpret and measure the marginal bone level. The image quality of each site was classified as excellent, acceptable or unacceptable. Depiction errors affecting interpretability and measurability were also noted. In the upper arch, the frequency of uninterpretable and non-measurable sites was almost equal for panoramic and periapical radiography. Image quality was better with periapical radiography in the lower arch. In the posterior regions of both arches, more sites could not be measured from panoramic compared with bitewing radiographs. Due to overlapping the distal surface of the maxillary canine and the mesial surface of the first maxillary premolar could often not be interpreted in either panoramic or periapical radiographs, but infrequently in the bitewings. In the lower arch, the most frequent depiction error was inadequate density in the incisor region of panoramic radiographs. On the basis of these results, we proposed that in clinical practice the panoramic radiograph can be supplemented with individually selected periapicals. In epidemiological studies, the panoramic radiograph should be combined with a premolar bitewing radiograph. |
