首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Benefit of Deep Inspiratory Breath Hold for Right Breast Cancer When Regional Lymph Nodes Are Irradiated
Institution:1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri;2. Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri;3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri;4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St Louis, Missouri;1. Medical Physics and Research Department, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, China;2. Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, China;1. Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;2. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina;3. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;4. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas;5. Department of Urologic Trauma and Reconstruction, St. Elizabeth''s Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract:BackgroundAlthough deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) is routinely used for left-sided breast cancers, its benefits for right-sided breast cancer (rBC) have yet to be established. We compared free-breathing (FB) and DIBH treatment plans for a cohort of rBC undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to determine its potential benefits.Methods and MaterialsrBC patients considered for RNI (internal mammary nodal chains, supraclavicular field, with or without axilla) from October 2017 to May 2020 were included in this analysis. For each patient, FB versus DIBH plans were generated and dose volume histograms evaluated the following parameters: mean lung dose, ipsilateral lung V20/V5 (volumes of lung receiving 20 Gy and 5 Gy, respectively); mean heart dose and heart V5 (volumes of heart receiving 5 Gy); liver V20 absolute /V30 absolute (absolute volume of liver receiving 20 Gy and 30 Gy, respectively), liver Dmax, and total liver volume irradiated (TVIliver). The dosimetric parameters were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank testing.ResultsFifty-four patients were eligible for analysis, comparing 108 FB and DIBH plans. DIBH significantly decreased all lung and liver parameters: mean lung dose (19.7 Gy-16.2 Gy, P < .001), lung V20 (40.7%-31.7%, P < .001), lung V5 (61.2%-54.5%, P < .001), TVIliver (1446 cc vs 1264 cc; P = .006) liver Dmax (50.2 Gy vs 48.9 Gy; P = .023), liver V20 (78.8-23.9 cc, P < .001), and liver V30 (58.1-14.6 cc, P < .001) compared with FB. DIBH use did not significantly improve heart parameters, although the V5Heart trended on significance (1.25-0.6, P = .067).ConclusionsThis is the largest cohort to date analyzing DIBH for RNI-rBC. Our findings demonstrate significant improvement in all lung and liver parameters with DIBH, supporting its routine consideration for rBC patients undergoing comprehensive RNI.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号