Diagnostic accuracy of history taking to assess lumbosacral nerve root compression |
| |
Authors: | Annemieke J.H. Verwoerd Wilco C. Peul Sten P. Willemsen Bart W. Koes Carmen L.A.M. Vleggeert-Lankamp Abdelilah el Barzouhi Pim A.J. Luijsterburg Arianne P. Verhagen |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University College Cork Medical School, Brookfield College of Health Sciences, College Rd, Cork, Ireland;2. ASSERT Simulation Centre, University College Cork Medical School, Brookfield College of Health Sciences, College Rd, Cork, Ireland;3. University College Cork Department of General Practice, Western Gate Building, Western Road, Cork, Ireland;1. Department of Neurosurgery, Dursun Odabas Medical Center, Yuzuncuyil University, Merkez Kampus Tu?ba, 65400 Van, Turkey;2. Department of Radiology, Dursun Odabas Medical Center, Yuzuncuyil University, Merkez Kampus Tu?ba, 65400 Van, Turkey |
| |
Abstract: | Background contextThe diagnosis of sciatica is primarily based on history and physical examination. Most physical tests used in isolation show poor diagnostic accuracy. Little is known about the diagnostic accuracy of history items.PurposeTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of history taking for the presence of lumbosacral nerve root compression or disc herniation on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with sciatica.Study designCross-sectional diagnostic study.Patient sampleA total of 395 adult patients with severe disabling radicular leg pain of 6 to 12 weeks duration were included.Outcome measuresLumbosacral nerve root compression and disc herniation on magnetic resonance imaging were independently assessed by two neuroradiologists and one neurosurgeon blinded to any clinical information.MethodsData were prospectively collected in nine hospitals. History was taken according to a standardized protocol. There were no study-specific conflicts of interest.ResultsExploring the diagnostic odds ratio of 20 history items revealed a significant contribution in diagnosing nerve root compression for “male sex,” “pain worse in leg than in back,” and “a non-sudden onset.” A significant contribution to the diagnosis of a herniated disc was found for “body mass index <30,” “a non-sudden onset,” and “sensory loss.” Multivariate logistic regression analysis of six history items pre-selected from the literature (age, gender, pain worse in leg than in back, sensory loss, muscle weakness, and more pain on coughing/sneezing/straining) revealed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.71) for the model diagnosing nerve root compression and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.74) for the model diagnosing disc herniation.ConclusionsA few history items used in isolation had significant diagnostic value and the diagnostic accuracy of a model with six pre-selected items was poor. |
| |
Keywords: | Sciatica Diagnosis Medical history taking Sensitivity Specificity Disc herniation Nerve root compression Magnetic resonance imaging |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|