External validation of alternative fistula risk score (a-FRS) for predicting pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundThe utility of the proposed alternative fistula risk score (a-FRS) for predicting risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has not been validated widely.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included data of patients undergoing open and laparoscopic PD during March 2012–May 2018 in our institution. The predictive abilities of a-FRS and original-FRS were compared. Risk factors for CR-POPF were also evaluated by multivariate regression analysis.ResultsOf the 370 patients, 80 (21.62%) developed CR-POPF. The incidences of CR-POPF in patients classified as low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk by a-FRS were 5.88%, 24.38%, and 57.69%, respectively (R2 = 0.97). The incidences of CR-POPF in patients classified as negligible risk, low risk, intermediate risk, and high-risk by original-FRS were 0%, 8.62%, 21.51%, and 52.50%, respectively (R2 = 0.92). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.74 for a-FRS vs. 0.70 for original-FRS. The a-FRS performed better than original-FRS for prediction of CR-POPF in open PD patients (AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.69) and was comparable with original- FRS in laparoscopic PD patients (AUC: 0.70 vs. 0.72).ConclusionsThe a-FRS appears to be an accurate and convenient tool for predicting occurrence of CR-POPF after PD.