| 米氮平与氟西丁治疗老年抑郁症患者的对照研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱金富.米氮平与氟西丁治疗老年抑郁症患者的对照研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2006,14(5):546-547. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱金富 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国.河南新乡医学院心理学系,453003 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 河南省高校创新人才资助项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的探讨米氮平治疗老年抑郁症患者的疗效和副反应。方法46例符合CCMD-3抑郁症诊断标准的年龄〉60岁老年抑郁症患者，应用米氮平和氟西丁各23例进行随机对照研究，观察6周，采用汉密顿抑郁量表（HAMD）和副反应量表（TESS）观察患者对治疗的疗效和副反应的变化。结果两种药物疗效相仿，米氮平起效快，副反应少。结论米氮平治疗老年抑郁症患者安全有效，副反应小。
|
| 关 键 词： | 米氮平 氟西丁 老年抑郁症 副反应量表 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-03-20 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-03-20 |
Comparative Study of Mirtazapine and Fluoxetine in the Treatment of Senile Depression |
| |
| Zhu Jinfu.Comparative Study of Mirtazapine and Fluoxetine in the Treatment of Senile Depression[J].china journal of health psychology,2006,14(5):546-547. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhu Jinfu |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical College, 453003 P. R. China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To explore the efficacy and side effects of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in the treatment of senile depression. Methods 46 senile depression patients according to CCMD-3, whose ages were more than 60 years old, were randomly divided into mirtazapine group (n=23) and fluoxetine group (n=23) for 6 weeks. Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS) were adopted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and side effects. Results Two drugs had similar efficacy, but mirtazapine took effects more quickly. The side effect was fewer. Conclusion Mitazapine in the treatment of senile depression patients is a safe and effective antidepressant and side effects is fewer. |
| |
| Keywords: | Mitazapine Fluoxetine Senile depression patients TESS |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
