首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Causal assessment of occupational standing or walking and low back pain: results of a systematic review
Authors:Darren M. Roffey  Eugene K. Wai  Paul Bishop  Brian K. Kwon  Simon Dagenais
Affiliation:1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Seongsan-gu, Changwon, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea 51472;2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea;3. Department of Computer Science and Statistics, Daegu University, Gyeongsansi, Republic of Korea;4. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea;5. Institute of Aging, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea;6. Rheumatism Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea;1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia;2. Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Abstract:Background contextLow back pain (LBP) is a widespread musculoskeletal condition that frequently occurs in the working-age population. Numerous occupational physical activities have been implicated in its etiology.PurposeTo conduct a systematic review establishing a causal relationship between occupational standing or walking and LBP.Study designSystematic review of the literature.SampleStudies reporting an association between occupational standing or walking and LBP.Outcome measuresNumerical association between exposure to standing or walking and the presence of LBP.MethodsA systematic review was performed to identify, evaluate, and summarize the literature related to establishing a causal relationship, according to Bradford-Hill criteria for causality, between occupational standing or walking and LBP. A search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Occupational Safety and Health database, gray literature, hand-searching occupational health journals, reference lists of included studies, and expert knowledge. Evaluation of methodological quality was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.ResultsThis search yielded 2,766 citations. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Five were high-quality studies related to standing, and two were high-quality studies related to walking. For occupational standing and LBP, there was moderate to strong evidence against the association criterion, the only study examining dose response did not support this criterion, four studies examining temporality failed to support this criterion, and only one study discussed the biological plausibility criterion. For occupational walking and LBP, there was moderate evidence against a causal relationship with respect to the association, temporality, dose response, and biological plausibility criteria. No studies assessed the experiment criterion for these activities.ConclusionsA summary of existing studies was not able to find any high-quality studies that satisfied more than two of the Bradford-Hill causation criteria for occupational standing or walking and LBP. Based on the evidence reviewed, it is unlikely that occupational standing or walking is independently causative of LBP in the populations of workers studied.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号