首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同方法治疗输卵管妊娠效果分析
引用本文:周凤. 不同方法治疗输卵管妊娠效果分析[J]. 河北医学, 2011, 17(3): 384-386. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2011.03.040
作者姓名:周凤
作者单位:广东省深圳市宝安区福永人民医院妇产科,广东,深圳,518000
摘    要:目的:比较腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术对输卵管妊娠患者的影响.方法:入选247例患者,分为腔镜组和开腹组治疗,比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、下床时间以及总住院时间,并两组患者住院期间发生的并发症.结果:两组手术时间比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),腔镜组术中出血明显少于开腹组(P<0.05),腔镜组...

关 键 词:腹腔镜  开腹  输卵管妊娠

Effect of Different Methods for Treatment of Tubal Pregnancy
ZHOU Feng. Effect of Different Methods for Treatment of Tubal Pregnancy[J]. Hebei Medicine, 2011, 17(3): 384-386. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2011.03.040
Authors:ZHOU Feng
Affiliation:ZHOU Feng(Fuyong People’s Hospital of Baoan in Shenzhen,Guangdong Shenzhen 518000,China)
Abstract:Objective: To compare the laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery for tubal pregnancy patients.Method: 247 patients selected were divided into endoscopic treatment group and the laparotomy group,two groups were compared operative time,blood loss,anal exhaust time,ambulation time and hospital stay,and two groups of patients hospitalized during complications.Result: The operative time between the two groups has no significant difference(P〉0.05).Blood loss in laparoscopy group was significantly less than that in the open group(P〈0.05).Anal exhaust time,postoperative ambulation time and hospital stay in endoscopic group were significantly shorter than the open abdominal group(P〈0.05),complications in laparoscopy group was mainly subcutaneous emphysema and abdominal puncture injuries,laparotomy group was mainly poor wound healing.Conclusion: Laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy compared with traditional open surgery has obvious advantages,surgical trauma,rapid recovery,safety,it is a safe and feasible method.
Keywords:Laparoscopy  Laparotomy  Tubal pregnancy
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号