| Abstract: | The central effects of the new antihistamine loratadine and three reference antihistamine agents were studied in the cat. As a sensitive measure of drug action on the central nervous system (CNS) we evaluated changes in sleep-waking patterns. For comparison, diphenhydramine was studied as an example of an antihistamine having potent central effects; astemizole and terfennadine were used as examples of new agents claimed to be free of CNS effects. Diphenhydramine, given at 3 mg/kg p.o., increased spindle sleep, i.e., the electrophysiological correlate of drowsiness, and suppressed rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. In addition, cats displayed unusual sleep postures during the various sleep stages. Loratadine had little or no effect on the various features of sleep-waking patterns over a broad dose range (3 and 30 mg/kg p.o.). Astemizole, at 30 mg/kg p.p., significantly increased wakefulness and reduced both slow-wave sleep and REM. No significant changes of the sleep patterns occurred after the low dose of 3 mg/kg. Terfenadine reduced REM duration at 30 mg/kg p.o. but had no effects on sleep patterns at 3 mg/kg. The cat appeared to be a sensitive animal model to the central action of antihistamines since the reference drug diphenhydramine affected sleep-waking patterns at a dose that closely approximates the dose requirements for adverse CNS effects in man. Under the same conditions, loratadine was free of central actions at a dose range far above that effective either therapeutically or in standard tests in other animal species. Astemizole and terfenadine seemed to be devoid of CNS effects at doses similar to those effective as antihistamines in man, but they produced some central actions at higher doses. Comparing the clinically effective doses of the antihistamines examined, loratadine appears to be the least liable to produce adverse effects on the CNS function. |
