首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血内镜治疗的疗效对比
引用本文:周凯,吴礼国. 肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血内镜治疗的疗效对比[J]. 中国医药指南, 2013, 0(35): 314-315
作者姓名:周凯  吴礼国
作者单位:成都市温江区人民医院内三科,四川成都611130
摘    要:目的分析肝硬化并EVB(食管静脉曲张破裂出血)不同内镜治疗方法的对EVB消除的疗效。方法选取67例EVB患者,分为三组;研究组采用EVL+EVS方式治疗,对照组A、对照组B分别单用EVL与EVS方式治疗,比较三组临床效果及不良反应如近期出血率、晚期出血率、死亡及其他不良情况。结果研究组治愈率为82.6%,对照组A治愈率为81.0%,对照组B治愈率为69.6%;研究组不良情况整体发生率明显更低;研究组效果更显著(P<0.05)。结论 EVB采用EVL与EVS联合的内镜治疗方式,安全有效,值得推广。

关 键 词:肝硬化  EVB  内镜治疗术  EVL  EVS

The Clinical Comparison of Treating Cirrhosis Esophageal Varices Bleeding by Endoscope
ZHOU Kai,WU Li-Guo. The Clinical Comparison of Treating Cirrhosis Esophageal Varices Bleeding by Endoscope[J]. Guide of China Medicine, 2013, 0(35): 314-315
Authors:ZHOU Kai  WU Li-Guo
Affiliation:(Department of Internal Medicine, Wenjiang District People's Hospital, Chengdu 611130, China)
Abstract:Objective To analyze the effect of different way of treating cirrhosis esophageal varices bleeding(EVB)by endoscope. Methods Choosed 67 EVB patients to divide into three groups. The study group were treated with EVL+EVS, the controlled A group were treated with EVL, and controlled B group were treated with EVS. Compared the clinical effect and adverse effets, such as rate of bleeding, death. Results The cure rate of study group were 82.6%, higher than 81.0% and 69.6% of controlled group. The incidence of adverse effects of study group was .lower than controlled group(P〈0.05). Conclusion Using EVL combing EVS to treat EVB patients is safe and effective to extend in clinic.
Keywords:Cirrhosis  EVB  Endoscope  EVL  EVS
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号