首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduoden oscopy in elderly and bedridden patients
Authors:Mika Yuki  Yuji Amano  Yoshinori Komazawa  Hiroyuki Fukuhara  Toshihiro Shizuku  Shun Yamamoto  Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Institution:1. Division of Internal Medicine, Izumo-City General Medical Center, 613 Nadabunn-cho, Izumo-shi,Shimane 693-0003, Japan
2. Division of Endoscopy, Shimane University Hospital, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo-shi, Shimane 693-8501, Japan
3. Division of Internal Medicine, Unnan Municipal General Hospital, 96-1 Iida-cho, Unnan-shi, Shimane 699-1221, Japan
4. Second Department of Internal Medicine, Shimane University, School of Medicine, 89-1 Enyacho,Izumo-shi, Shimane 693-8501, Japan
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate the safety of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for elderly and critically ill bedridden patients.METHODS: One prospective randomized comparative study and one crossover comparative study between transnasal small-caliber EGD and transoral conventional EGD was done (Study 1). For the comparative study,we enrolled 240 elderly patients aged > 65 years old.For the crossover analysis, we enrolled 30 bedridden patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy(PEG) (Study 2). We evaluated cardiopulmonary effects by measuring arterial oxygen saturation (SpO_2) and calculating the rate-pressure product (RPP) (pulse rate × systolic blood pressure/100) at baseline, 2 and 5 min after endoscopic intubation in Study 1. To assess the risk for endoscopy-related aspiration pneumonia during EGD, we also measured blood leukocyte counts and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels before and 3 d after EGD in Study 2.RESULTS: In Study 1, we observed significant decreases in SpO_2 during conventional transoral EGD,but not during transnasal small-caliber EGD (0.24% vs-0.24% after 2 min, and 0.18% vs -0.29% after 5 min,P = 0.034, P = 0.044). Significant differences of the RPP were not found between conventional transoral and transnasal small-caliber EGD. In Study 2, crossover analysis showed statistically significant increases of the RPP at 2 min after intubation and the end of endoscopy (26.8 and 34.6 vs 3.1 and 15.2, P = 0.044, P = 0.046),and decreases of SpO_2 (-0.8% vs -0.1%, P = 0.042) during EGD with transoral conventional in comparison with transnasal small-caliber endoscopy. Thus, for bedridden patients with PEG feeding, who were examined in the supine position, transoral conventional EGD more severely suppressed cardiopulmonary function than transnasal small-caliber EGD. There were also significant increases in the markers of inflammation,blood leukocyte counts and serum CRP values, in bedridden patients after transoral conventional EGD, but not after transnasal small-caliber EGD performed with the patient in the supine position. Leukocyte count increased from 6053 ± 1975/L to 6900 ± 3392/L ( P = 0.0008) and CRP values increased from 0.93 ± 0.24 to 2.49 ± 0.91 mg/dL ( P = 0.0005) at 3 d after transoral conventional EGD. Aspiration pneumonia, possibly caused by the endoscopic examination, was found subsequently in two of 30 patients after transoral conventional EGD.CONCLUSION: Transnasal small-caliber EGD is a safer method than transoral conventional EGD in critically ill,bedridden patients who are undergoing PEG feeding.
Keywords:Aged  Aspiration pneumonia  Gastrointestinal endoscopy  Critical illness
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号