塑料安瓿与玻璃安瓿临床使用便利性的比较

目的检验塑料安瓿开启操作的便利性以及识别药品的方便性；了解护理人员对两种材质包装安瓿的接受程度；调查护士临床工作中发生的与安瓿使用相关的职业伤害情况。方法采用对照研究结合问卷调查。选择31名护士分别开启玻璃安瓿和塑料安瓿各10个，比较塑料安瓿和玻璃安瓿在开启时间、安瓿开启的破损率、护士识别药品所花费时间和药品识别正确率等方面的差异；以问卷调查法调查170名护士对两种材质安瓿的接受程度及在临床工作中所发生的与安瓿使用相关的职业伤害情况。结果开启塑料安瓿用时明显少于玻璃安瓿（20．10±3．50）s比（40．25±11．24）s；t=10．35，P〈0．01]，但两者在辨认安瓿的用时和准确率方面差异无统计学意义（t=-0．99，P〉0．05）。有97．6％的护士更倾向于使用塑料安瓿，99．4％的护士认为使用塑料安瓿可减少手的割破伤，72．4％的护士认为塑料安瓿在临床能够得到全面推广。结论塑料安瓿比玻璃安瓿使用便利，可提高工作效率；而且可以有效预防玻璃割破伤，有利于护士职业防护，可在临床中推广使用。

Study on the convenience in clinical application of plastic ampoules and glass ampoules

Objective To test the convenience of the plastic ampoules in opemng operations and identification; to explore the acceptance of nurses for the packaging materials,and the incidence of the occupational injuries associated with using ampoules.Methods Combined control study with questionnaire survey.Opening time,breakage rate,recognition time and recognition accuracy in control study were compared between the plastic ampoules and glass ampoules in 31 nurses who 10 opening plastic and glass ampoules respectively.Acceptance of nurses for the materials and the incidence of the occupational injuries associated with using ampoule were surveyed in 170 nurses through the questionnaire in.Results There are significantly differences between the plastic ampoules and the glass ampoules in opening time (20.10 ±3.50)s vs (40.25 ±11.24)s;t =10.35,P ＜0.01 ],but there is no significant difference in the time of identifying ampoules and the correct rate ( t =- 0.99,P ＞ 0.05 ).97.6％ of the nurses tend to use plastic ampoule,and 99.4％ of the nurses believe that the use of plastic ampoules can reduce injuries,and 72.4％ of nurses believe that the plastic ampoule can be widely used.Conclusions Using the plastic ampoules can improve efficiency and effectively prevent iniuries.The plastic ampoules can be used widely in clinic.