看图对话与传统健康教育对糖尿病患者教育效果的对比研究

目的评价不同糖尿病健康教育方式对2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病知识掌握的影响。方法以2010年3—5月期间人院的79例2型糖尿病患者作为研究对象,根据人院时间段分为实验组和对照组,前半段人院患者为实验组,即看图对话健康教育组,利用糖尿病健康教育图进行教育;后半段人院患者作为对照组即健康讲座组,接受传统的健康讲座的教育形式。教育前后分别用糖尿病知识测评量表评价糖尿病知识水平。结果两组自身前后对照结果发现健康教育干预后患者的糖尿病知识水平均较干预前显著提高。组问对照结果发现看图对话组与健康讲座组在健康教育干预前后糖尿病知识得分比较差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。看图对话组100％的患者认为这种方式有助于提高学习兴趣,68．3％的患者认为对掌握糖尿病知识非常有帮助,80．0％的患者最希望采用小组讨论的教育方式。而对照组只有74．4％的患者认为可以提高学习兴趣,15．4％的患者认为对掌握糖尿病知识非常有帮助,46．2％的患者最希望采用小组讨论的教育方式。结论与传统的健康教育相比,看图对话的教育方式虽不能明显提高2型糖尿病患者糖尿病知识的水平,但能大大提升糖尿病患者学习糖尿病知识的积极性,提高其学习兴趣。

Comparison study on health education of diabetes patients between figure dialogue and traditional healthy education

Objective To evaluate the influence of two different education approaches on diabetic knowledge of type Ⅱ diabetes.Methods 79 type Ⅱ diabetes cases were collected from March 2010 to May 2010,and divided into experimental group and control group according to admission time.Experimental group was those in the first-half,and received figure dialogue education.Control group was those in the last-half,and received traditional heath education.Diabetes knowledge assessment questionnaire was used to evaluate knowledge level before and after education.Results Knowledge level was higher after education than that before education in both groups.No differences was found between the two groups ( P ＞ 0.05 ).All subjects in experimental group thought figure education could improve the study interesting,68.3％ subjects thought mastering knowledge about diabetes was useful,and 80.0％ subjects expect discussion by group.However,74.4％ subjects in control group thought traditional education could improve the study interesting,15.4％ subjects thought mastering knowledge about diabetes was useful,and 46.2％ subjects expect discussion by group.Conclusions Compare with traditional education,figure education although could not increase the knowledge level about diabetes significantly,but could highly increase the interesting of study.