首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

胃镜下探条或自制气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症疗效的对比研究
引用本文:尹毅霞,黄赞松,周喜汉.胃镜下探条或自制气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症疗效的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(12):1082-1084.
作者姓名:尹毅霞  黄赞松  周喜汉
作者单位:右江民族医学院附属医院消化科,百色,533000
基金项目:致谢:衷心感谢北京大学第三医院消化科丁士刚教授对本文的指导及校审.
摘    要:目的对比分析胃镜下应用探条或自制气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症的疗效。方法1998年1月~2007年12月,胃镜下治疗贲门失弛缓症45例,其中应用自制气囊扩张22例(自制气囊组),应用探条扩张23例(探条组),比较2组疗效。结果探条组23例扩张1~9次,平均3.6次;自制气囊组22例扩张1~6次,平均2.3次。2组术中及术后均无并发症发生。首次治疗费用探条组(1542.57±281.30)元,自制气囊组(861.91±176.48)元(t=9.671,P=0.000)。扩张后3个月的疗效2组差异无显著性探条组显效14例(61%)、有效8例(35%)、无效1例(4%),自制气囊组显效15例(68%)、有效5例(23%)、无效2例(9%),Z=-0.351,P=0.726]。扩张后6个月的疗效2组差异有显著性探条组显效5例(22%)、有效3例(13%)、无效15例(65%),自制气囊组显效10例(45%)、有效7例(32%)、无效5例(23%),Z=2.564,P=0.010]。结论胃镜下应用探条和自制气囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症安全、简便,患者恢复快,尤其自制气囊扩张器设备简单,就地取材,疗效肯定,在基层医院具有良好的推广价值。

关 键 词:贲门失弛缓症  探条  自制气囊  胃镜

Comparison between Endoscopic Probe and Self made Balloon Device for Cardia Achalasia
Yin Yixia,Huang Zansong,Zhou Xihan.Comparison between Endoscopic Probe and Self made Balloon Device for Cardia Achalasia[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2008,8(12):1082-1084.
Authors:Yin Yixia  Huang Zansong  Zhou Xihan
Institution:(Department of Digestive Diseases, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities, Baise 533000, China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of endoscopic probe and self-made balloon device in dilation of the cardia for patients with cardia achalasia. Methods From January 1998 to December 2007, 45 patients with cardia achalasia received gastroscopy-assisted dilation at our hospital ; 22 of them were treated by self-made balloon device and 23 were by endoscopic probe. The efficacies of the two methods were compared. Results In the probe group, each patients received 1 to 9 times of dilation (mean, 3.6) , while in the balloon group it was 1 to 6 times ( mean, 2.3 ). None of the two groups had intra- and post-operative complications. The cost for the first treatment was ( 1542.57 ± 281.30) yuan in probe group, and ( 861.91 ± 176.48) yuan in the balloon group ( t = 9. 671, P = 0. 000). The efficacy of the two groups was similar in 3 months after the treatment the rates of the cured, improved, and failed were 61% (14), 35% (8), and 4% (1) in the probe group, and 68% (15), 23% (5), and 9% (2) in the balloon group, Z= -0.351, P=0.726], but significantly different in6 months 22% (5), 13% (3), and 65% (15) vs45% (10), 32% (7), and 23% (5), Z = 2. 564, P = 0. 010]. Conclusions Both endoscopic probe and self-made balloon device are effective in dilatation of the cardia for cardia achalasia. Self-made balloon device dilatation is exceptionally suitable for local hospitals because of its low cost and simple techniques.
Keywords:Cardia achalasia  Probe  Self-made balloon device  Endoscope
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号