首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

糖尿病足危险因素分析
引用本文:李永恒,何利平,王椿,刘关键,陈大伟,陈利鸿,冉兴无.糖尿病足危险因素分析[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2012,4(3):155-158.
作者姓名:李永恒  何利平  王椿  刘关键  陈大伟  陈利鸿  冉兴无
作者单位:1. 四川大学华西医院内分泌代谢科糖尿病足诊治中心, 成都,610041
2. 中国循证医学中心/中国Cochrane中心
摘    要:目的探讨糖尿病(DM)患者发生糖尿病足(DF)的危险因素。方法利用病案查询系统检索1996年1月至2009年12月四川大学华西医院DF患者的总出院人数为662例,男371例,291例,平均年龄(664-11)岁;同期入院无DF的DM患者353例,男205例,女148例,平均年龄(66±9)岁。根据是否合并DF将所有患者分为DF患者组(DFP组)和非DF患者组(non.DFP组)。用卡方检验和单、多因素logistic回归分析方法对常见危险因素进行分析。结果与non—DFP组相比,DFP组糖尿病慢性并发症糖尿病肾病(DN)、糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)、周围动脉病变(PAD)、糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)、糖尿病自主神经病变(DAN)的发生率均明显高于non—DFP组,组间差异均有统计学意义(X。=34.133、11.694、165.727、85.852、72.021,均P〈0.05);且其肺部感染、骨质疏松的发生率更高,差异亦均有统计学意义(X2=32.619,23.932,均P〈0.05)。单因素分析显示吸烟、DN、DR、PAD、DPN、DAN是DF的危险因素(Wald=4.874、33.516、11.581、146.356、82.446、67,686,均P〈0.05);高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL—C)(Wald=25.532,P=0.000)是DF的保护性因素。多因素非条件logistic回归分析显示DN、DPN、DAN、PAD是DF的危险因素(Wald=11.007、21.484、11.963、87.427,均P〈0.05);而HDL—C(Wald=14.971,P=0.000)是DF的保护性因素。结论DN、DPN、DAN、PAD是DF的危险因素,而HDL—C是DF的保护因素。

关 键 词:糖尿病足  危险因素  回归分析

Analysis of risk factors of diabetic foot
LI Yong-heng , HE Li-ping , WANG Chun , LIU Guan-jian , CHEN Da-wei , CHEN Li-hong , RAN Xing-wu.Analysis of risk factors of diabetic foot[J].CHINESE JOURNAL OF DIABETES MELLITUS,2012,4(3):155-158.
Authors:LI Yong-heng  HE Li-ping  WANG Chun  LIU Guan-jian  CHEN Da-wei  CHEN Li-hong  RAN Xing-wu
Institution:LI Yong-heng , HE Li-ping, WANG Chun, LIU Guan-fian,CHEN Da-wei, CHEN Li-hong, RAN Xing-wta * Diabetic Foot Care Center, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China Corresponding author : RAN Xing-wu, Email : ranxingwu@ yahoo, com cn
Abstract:Objective To identify risk factors of diabetic foot (DF) in patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods All medical records of 662 DF inpatients ( DFP group ) and 353 diabetic inpatients without DF (non-DFP group ) treated from January 1996 to December 2009 in West China Hospital were retrieved. There were 371 males and 291 females in DFP group with a mean age of (66 -+ 11 ) y, and 205 males and 148 females in non-DFP group with a mean age of (66 + 9 ) y. Chi-square test, univariate logistic regression analysis and multivariate and non-conditional logistic regression analysis were used to identify the risk factors of DF. Results The incidence of diabetic nephropathy ( DN ), diabetic retinopathy ( DR ), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) , diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN)in DFP group were higher than those in non-DFP group(x2 =34. 133, 11. 694, 165. 727, 85. 852, 72. 021, respectively, all P 〈 0. 05 ). Lung infection and osteoporosis occurred more often in DFP group than in non-DFP group ( X2 = 32. 619, 23. 932, both P 〈 0. 05 ). The univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that smoking( Wald = 4. 874), DN ( Wald = 33. 516) , DR ( Wald = 11. 581 ), PAD ( Wald = 146. 356), DPN ( Wald = 82. 446 ) and DAN ( Wald = 67. 686 ) were risk factors for DF ( all P 〈 0. 05 ), HDL-C ( Wald = 25. 532, P 〈 O. 05 ) was protective factor against DF. Multivariate and non-conditional logistic regression analysis showed that DN ( Wald = 58. 837 ), DPN ( Wald = 21. 484), DAN ( Wald = 11. 963 ) and PAD ( Wald = 87.427 ) were risk factors for DF ( all P 〈 0. 05 ) , HDL-C ( Wald = 14. 971, P 〈 0. 05) was protective factor against DF. Conclusion It suggests that DN, DPN, DAN and PAD are associated with an increased risk of DF, while HDL-C is the protective factor against DF.
Keywords:Diabetic foot  Risk factors  Logistic regression analysis
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号