Light cola drink is less erosive than the regular one: An in situ/ex vivo study |
| |
Authors: | Daniela Rios,Heitor Marques Honó rio,Ana Carolina Magalhã es,Annette Wiegand,Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado,Marí lia Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Alameda Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75, PO Box 73, Bauru, SP 17012-101, Brazil;2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Alfenas Federal University, Gabriel Monteiro da Silva Street, 714, Alfenas, MG 37130-000, Brazil;3. Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University Zurich Plattenstr., 11 CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland;4. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Alameda Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75, PO Box 73, Bauru, SP 17012-101, Brazil |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveThis in situ/ex vivo study assessed the erosive potential of a light cola drink when compared to a regular one.MethodsDuring 2 experimental 14-days crossover phases, eight volunteers wore palatal devices with 2 human enamel blocks. The groups under study were: group light, erosive challenge with light cola drink and group regular, erosive challenge with regular cola drink. During 14 days, erosive challenges were performed extraorally 3X/day. In each challenge, the device was immersed in 150 ml of light cola (group light) or regular cola (group regular) for 5 min. Erosion was analysed by surface profilometry (μm) and surface microhardness change (%SMH). The data were statistically analyzed using paired t test (p < 0.05).ResultsGroup light (0.6 ± 0.2 μm) showed significantly lesser wear than group regular (3.1 ± 1.0 μm). There was no significant difference between the groups for the %SMH (group light −63.9 ± 13.9 and group regular −78.5 ± 12.7).ConclusionsThe data suggest that the light cola drink is less erosive than the regular one. |
| |
Keywords: | Erosion Soft drinks In situ Enamel |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|