钢板内固定与经皮克氏针固定治疗桡骨远端骨折疗效比较

目的 比较切开复位钢板内固定和经皮克氏针固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效.方法选取2002年1月-2007年6月收治的110例行切开复位内固定的桡骨远端骨折患者,选取同期107例行经皮克氏针固定的患者,随访比较两组临床疗效. 结果 所有患者随访5-12个月,按Gartland和Werley评分标准,钢板内固定组的优良率为86.4%,经皮克氏针固定组优良率为74.8%(P<0.05).而C3型骨折单独比较,两组优良率分别为76.9%和70.0%(P>0.05). 结论 切开复位内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折总体临床疗效优于经皮克氏针组,但治疗C3型骨折疗效欠佳.

Treatment of distal radius fractures:a comparison between plate internal fixation and percutaneous K-wires fixation

Objective To compare the clinical results of open reduction and plate internal fixation and percutaneous kirschner-wire fixation in the management of distal radius fractures. Methods A retrospective comparison was done on clinical data of 110 patients with distal radius fractures who were treated by plate internal fixation and that of 107 by pereutaneous kirschner-wire fixation from January 2002 to June 2007. Results All patients were followed up for 5-12 months. According to Gartland and Werley scoring system, the excellent rate was 86.4% in plate internal fixation group, which was significantly higher than 74.8% in percutaneous kirschner-wire fixation group (P <0.05). As for type C3 fractures, the excellent rate of the two groups were 76.9% and 70.0%, with no statistical difference (P >0.05). Conclusions Compared with percutaneous kirschner-wire fixation, plate internal fixation is better in treatment of distal radius fractures, but has poor results in management of type C3 fractures.