The effectiveness of behavioral interventions to improve oral health in adolescents at different periods of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Peadiatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China;2. Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China;1. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA;2. The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA, USA;3. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA;1. Department of Nursing, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China;2. Department of Emergency, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China;1. Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA;2. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA;3. Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA;4. School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA;5. PatientWisdom, Inc., New Haven, USA;6. Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundThe aim of this review was to examine the effectiveness of behavioral interventions at different follow-up periods to improve adolescents’ oral health.MethodsCENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: participants aged 10–19 years old, randomized controlled trials using behavioral interventions, outcome measurements including oral health knowledge, attitudes, practices, and oral health status. For each included study, behavior change techniques (BCT) were identified and the quality and risk of bias assessments obtained. PROSPERO reference: CRD42018090341.ResultsAfter searching and screening, 17 clinical trials were included in the systematic review. The most commonly used BCTs were behavior health link, information on consequences, and social comparisons. A significant reduction of plaque index was detected (SMD:-0.46; 95 % CI:-0.82∼-0.10) for 3 months and (SMD:-0.71; 95 % CI:-1.08∼-0.33) for 6 months. The reduction of gingival index after 6 months was also significant (SMD:-0.90; 95 % CI:-1.33∼-0.47). Oral health knowledge and oral health-related behavior were also improved after behavioral interventions.ConclusionThere is moderate evidence that behavioral interventions are effective in promoting oral health in adolescents. To establish more evidence-based conclusions, further research should focus on: quality control of interventions, full descriptions regarding the BCT, long-term follow-ups, and behavior change reinforcements.Practical ValueGiven the need of early prevention of oral diseases, well-designed oral health promotion programme are needed to improve behavior and outcome of adolescents’ oral health. |
| |
Keywords: | Systematic review Behavioral intervention Adolescent Oral health Meta-analysis |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|