ERPs changes during neuroleptic treatment in schizophrenia--a vulnerability marker in schizophrenia] |
| |
Authors: | N Asato Y Hirayasu K Hiramatsu H Ohta |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus. |
| |
Abstract: | P300 amplitude reduction and P300 latency prolongation are consistent findings in schizophrenia, but it is unclear if these abnormalities were the effect of current or past neuroleptic treatment or were present at the onset of illness. We previously recorded ERPs in drug free schizophrenic patients (45 neuroleptic-naive and 56 previously treated with neuroleptics). In that study, P300 amplitude reduction was observed in both the neuroleptic-naive and the previously treated patients. However, both N200 and P300 latencies were prolonged only in the previously treated schizophrenic patients. In this study, we investigated ERPs in 60 drug free schizophrenic patients before and after neuroleptic treatment was begun. According to DSM-IV, schizophrenia subtype classification, 26 cases were paranoid type, 14 were disorganized, 2 catatonic and 18 undifferentiated. Twenty six of the patients were neuroleptic-naive and 34 had been previously treated. Sixty gender- and age-matched healthy controls were also investigated. ERPs were recorded during an auditory oddball task. The scalp EEGs were recorded from AgAgCl electrodes at 16 sites according to the international 10-20 system. Clinical symptoms were assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Before treatment, all schizophrenic patients displayed larger N200 amplitudes than the controls; however, increases in N200 amplitudes were not observed after neuroleptic treatment was begun. Both N200 and P300 latencies in the patients before treatment were prolonged only in those previously treated. Neuroleptic-naive patients demonstrated prolongation of both N200 and P300 latencies only after treatment. P300 amplitudes in patients were increased by neuroleptic treatment; but patients had smaller P300 amplitudes than the controls even after treatment. The change in P300 amplitudes (Pz) and the change in total BPRS scores by neuroleptic treatment were positively correlated in the patients whose duration of illness was six months or less (mean: 2.4 months). However, no correlation was observed for patients whose duration of illness was over six months (mean: 49.7 months). There were no significant differences in ERPs changes among subtypes. These results suggested that the P300 amplitude should be considered a vulnerability marker in schizophrenia and that both N200 and P300 latencies might be markers for neuroleptic exposure. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|