首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

SARS-CoV特异性抗体产生规律的初步研究
引用本文:貌盼勇,朱雷,王佑春,侯俊,胡燕,沈宏辉,辛绍杰,李保森,毛远丽,庄辉. SARS-CoV特异性抗体产生规律的初步研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2004, 25(10): 856-858
作者姓名:貌盼勇  朱雷  王佑春  侯俊  胡燕  沈宏辉  辛绍杰  李保森  毛远丽  庄辉
作者单位:1. 100039,北京,解放军第三○二医院传染病研究所
2. 中国药品生物制品检定所细胞室
3. 北京大学医学部病原微生物学系
摘    要:目的 研究严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)患者感染后体内病毒特异性抗体产生规律。方法 收集临床确诊为SARS患者的血清和非SARS人群血清标本,用IgM捕获法、间接法和抗原夹心法三种不同方法检测抗SARS病毒特异性IgM、IgG和总抗体。结果 检测146份临床诊断为SARS的患者不同发病时间血清标本,三种抗体阳性率分别为61.64%、53.43%和69.86%;SARS病毒特异性IgM、IgG抗体的最早检出时间分别在发病第7天和第12天,特异性IgM抗体最短在发病后42天消失。三种方法检测70份甲型肝炎患者血清时,均有2份非特异阳性反应,检测127份其他病种血清均阴性,1例密切接触SARS患者的医务人员SARS特异性IgG抗体和总抗体均阳性,三种检测方法均不受类风湿因子影响。结论 与其他病毒感染相比,SARS病毒感染者的特异性IgM抗体检出时间较晚,且持续时间较短;三种检测方法均有较好的特异性和敏感性,可用于SARS的流行病学调查和临床诊断的确认和补充,但不适用于SARS的早期诊断。

关 键 词:严重急性呼吸综合征  病毒  特异性抗体
收稿时间:2003-11-05
修稿时间:2003-11-05

Study on the response of specific antibodies against SARS-CoV in patients infected with SARS
MAO Pan-yong,ZHU Lei,WANG You-chun,HOU Jun,HU Yan,SHEN Hong-hui,XIN Shao-jie,LI Bao-sen,MAO Yuan-li and ZHUANG Hui. Study on the response of specific antibodies against SARS-CoV in patients infected with SARS[J]. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 2004, 25(10): 856-858
Authors:MAO Pan-yong  ZHU Lei  WANG You-chun  HOU Jun  HU Yan  SHEN Hong-hui  XIN Shao-jie  LI Bao-sen  MAO Yuan-li  ZHUANG Hui
Affiliation:Institute of Infectious Diseases, Hospital 302 of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing 100039, China.
Abstract:Objective To study the response of specific antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome(SARS)-CoV in patients infected with SARS. Methods IgM-capture, indirect and antigen-sandwiched enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used to detect the SARS-CoV specific IgM, IgG and total antibodies in sera of clinical SARS patients or non-SARS individuals. Results The positive rates of IgM, IgG and total antibodies to SARS-CoV in 146 sera of SARS patients collected in different phases of the disease were 61.64 % ,53.43 % and 69.86 % , respectively. The earliest detectable days after onset of the disease for IgM and IgG to SRAS-CoV were 7 and 12 days, respectively. The specific IgM disappeared as early as 42 days after the onset of SARS. Of 70 sera from hepatitis A patients, 2 showed false positive results, while 127 sera from other patients were all negative, detected by the 3 methods. Serum from one medical worker who had been close contact to SARS patients was positive for anti-SARS-CoV IgG and total antibodies. These 3 methods used for detection were all not influenced by rheumatoid factor (RF). Conclusion All of the three methods were specific and sensitive for the detection of specific antibodies to SARS-CoV, and useful for epidemiological research and clinical diagnosis, but not for early diagnosis of SARS.
Keywords:Severe acute respiratory syndrome  Virus  Specific antibody
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号