首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

机器人辅助腹腔镜与后腹腔镜下肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤剜除术的比较
引用本文:崔亮,徐阿祥,董隽,朱捷,王威,郭刚,高江平,张旭. 机器人辅助腹腔镜与后腹腔镜下肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤剜除术的比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 0(2): 5-9
作者姓名:崔亮  徐阿祥  董隽  朱捷  王威  郭刚  高江平  张旭
作者单位:[1]中国人民解放军总医院海南分院泌尿外科,三亚572013 [2]中国人民解放军总医院泌尿外科 ,三亚572013 [3]北京大学民航临床医学院/民航总医院泌尿外科,三亚572013
基金项目:全军医学科技十二五科研项目(2010GXJS086)
摘    要:目的比较机器人辅助腹腔镜(RALE)与后腹腔镜下肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤剜除术(rLE)的临床应用。方法回顾性分析解放军总医院2005年6月至2009年1月共17例接受肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤剜除手术治疗的病例资料,其中11例行后腹腔镜下单纯剜除术,6例行机器人辅助腹腔镜“剜除+肾部分切除术”。结果rLE组与RALE组的平均手术时间分别为84.6±15.1(60~110)rain和158.3±37.1(120~210)min[P=0.0000],术中出血量50.9±27.7(20~100)ml和388.3±439.6(30~1000)ml[P=0.01971,术中。肾动脉阻断时问为0rain和29±8.7(20—45)min[P=0.0000],围手术期输血率为0%(0/11)和33.3%(2/6),术后引流管留置均为2—3d,术后住院时间平均8.8(6~14)d和8(7。9)d。术后两组均未出现尿漏及继发出血等并发症。随访21~24个月,所有患者未见局部病灶残留及复发,肾功能均在正常范围。结论rLE及RALE均为安全有效的治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的选择性保留。肾单位手术方法。随着操作经验的积累和手术技术的发展,机器人腹腔镜的优势将更加明显。

关 键 词:肾肿瘤  血管平滑肌脂肪瘤  机器人  腹腔镜  剜除术  保留。肾单位肾部分  切除术

A comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic enucleation for renal angiomyolipoma
CUI Liang,XU A-xiang,DONG Jun,ZHU Jie,WANG Wei,G UO Gang,GAO Jiang-ping,ZHANG Xu. A comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic enucleation for renal angiomyolipoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery ( Electronic Editon), 2013, 0(2): 5-9
Authors:CUI Liang  XU A-xiang  DONG Jun  ZHU Jie  WANG Wei  G UO Gang  GAO Jiang-ping  ZHANG Xu
Affiliation:. Department of urology, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic enucleation (RALE) with that of pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic enucleation (rLE) enucleation for renal angiomyolipoma. Methods This was a retrospective analysis consisting of 17 patients with renal angiomyolipoma from June 2005 to January 2009 in General Hospital of PLA, China . Eleven of them received pure tumor enucleation with rLE, while the rest 6 received pure enucleation and partial nephrectomy with RALE. The time of follow up was 21 - 24 months. Results The mean operation time of rLE and RALE were 84.6 ± 15.1 ( 60 - 110 ) min and 158.3 + 37.1 ( 120 -210 ) min[ P= 0.0000 ] respectively. The blood loss was 50.9 ± 27.7 ( 20 - 100 ) ml and 388.3 + 439.6 ( 30 - 1000 ) ml [ P= 0.0197 ],respectively. The renal artery blockade time during surgery are 0 rain and 29 ± 8.7 ( 20 - 45 ) min [ P = 0.0000 ],respectively. Theperioperative blood transfusion rate are 0% (0/11 )and 33.3% (2/6), respectively. The indwelling duration of drainage are both 2-3d,and the mean length of postoperative hospitalization time is 8.8 (6-14)and 8 (7-9)days, respectively. Both rLE and RALE enucleation for renal angiomyolipoma did not cause any complications such as urinary leakage and secondary hemorrhage. All patients exhibit no local residual or recurrence and their renal function are normal during the follow-up. Conclusions Both rLE and RALE tumor enucleation with partial nephreetomy are safe and effective in the treatment of renal angiomyolipoma. With the accumulation of operation experience and the development of surgical technique, the advantage of RALE will become more and more obvious.
Keywords:Renal neoplasms  Angiomyolipoma  Robot  Laparoscopy  Enucleation  Nephron sparingsurgery
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号