首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

Luminal B型乳腺癌合并糖尿病患者临床病理特征及预后分析
引用本文:孙蓓,侯国芳,张霄蓓,郝晓甍,张晟. Luminal B型乳腺癌合并糖尿病患者临床病理特征及预后分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2013, 40(17): 1042-1046. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.20131311
作者姓名:孙蓓  侯国芳  张霄蓓  郝晓甍  张晟
作者单位:①.天津医科大学肿瘤医院门诊部,国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心,乳腺癌防治教育部重点实验室(天津市300060)
基金项目:本文课题受天津市重大科技专项(工程)项目抗癌专项(编号12ZCDZSY15400)资助This work was supported by the Special Anticancer Funds of the Tianjin Major Scientific Projects (Engineering)
摘    要:  目的  探讨luminal B型乳腺癌合并糖尿病患者临床病理特征及预后特点。  方法  选取天津医科大学肿瘤医院2002年1月至2006年12月收治的luminal B型乳腺癌4 401例,其中合并糖尿病乳腺癌479例及未合并糖尿病乳腺癌3 392例。按照高敏感性luminal B和Her-2阳性luminal B两种亚型分组进行对比研究。各亚型进一步分组为二甲双胍治疗组、非二甲双胍治疗组和非糖尿病组。研究指标包括乳腺癌死亡率、临床病理分期、淋巴结状况、化疗方案及内分泌治疗方案。Kaplan-Meier方法分析各分组之间死亡率是否存在差异。Cox比例风险模型用于检测与预后相关的独立因素。  结果  Kaplan-Meier单因素分析法显示高敏感性luminal B、Her-2阳性luminal B型中二甲双胍治疗组、非二甲双胍治疗组和非糖尿病组癌症死亡率均存在显著性差异,5年生存率依次为93.5%、81.0%、89.0%(P < 0.001)和84.0%、77.0%、83.0%(P=0.035)。Cox回归模型多因素分析显示两类分型中相对于二甲双胍治疗组,非二甲双胍治疗组预后较差(P < 0.001,P=0.044)。但仅高敏感性luminal B分型相对于二甲双胍治疗组,非糖尿病组预后较差(P=0.038)。临床特征方面,二甲双胍治疗组和非二甲双胍治疗组T3~4期患者比例高(P < 0.001),更易发生淋巴结转移(P=0.001)。  结论  luminal B型乳腺癌分型中以二甲双胍治疗组作为参考,非二甲双胍治疗组均预示较差的预后,其中仅高敏感性luminal B分型中非糖尿病组预示了较差的预后。糖尿病用药对不同的luminal B分型乳腺癌患者预后影响可能不同。 

关 键 词:luminal B型乳腺癌   糖尿病   二甲双胍   预后
收稿时间:2013-07-25

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic analysis of luminal B breast cancer patients with diabetes
Bei SUN , Guofang HOU , Xiaobei ZHANG , Xiaomeng HAO , Sheng ZHANG. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic analysis of luminal B breast cancer patients with diabetes[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013, 40(17): 1042-1046. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.20131311
Authors:Bei SUN    Guofang HOU    Xiaobei ZHANG    Xiaomeng HAO    Sheng ZHANG
Abstract:  Objective  To investigate the clinical, pathological, and prognostic characteristics of luminal B breast cancer patients with diabetes.  Methods  Atotal of 479 luminal B breast cancer patients with diabetes and 3 392 luminal B breast cancer patients without diabetes who were treated between January 2002 and December 2006 were enrolled in this study. The luminal B breast cancer patients were further divided into the luminal B (high ki67) and luminal B (Her-2/neu+) subgroups. Each subgroup was further grouped into metformin-treated, non-metformin-treated, and non-diabetic groups. The indicators included cancer-specific mortality, clinical, pathological stage, lymph node status, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy. The survival analysis of each group was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the significance was determined using the logrank test. Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the correlation between each factor and the prognosis.  Results  The Kaplan-Meier analysis results revealed that the breast cancer mortality rates in the metformin-treated, non-metformin-treated, and non-diabetic groups were significantly different in both luminal B (high ki67) and luminal B (Her-2/neu+) subgroups (logrank test: P < 0.001, P=0.035), and the respective five-year survival rates were 93.5%, 81%, and 89% for the luminal B (high ki67) subgroup and 84%, 77%, and 83% for the luminal B (Her-2/neu+) subgroup. The Cox multifactorial regression analysis results showed that compared with the metformin-treated group, the non-metformin-treated group was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality (P < 0.001, P=0.044) in the two subgroups. Meanwhile, the non-diabetic group was associated with an increased risk of mortality (P=0.038) in the luminal B (high ki67) subgroup only. The percentage of elderly (P < 0.001), menopausal (P < 0.001), obese (P < 0.001), and patients with cardio-cerebrovascular complications (P < 0.001) tended to be higher in the metformin-treated and non-metformin-treated groups than in the diabetic group. Moreover, the metformin- and non-metformin-treated groups in the luminal B (high ki67) subgroup were associated with high percentages of T3/4 pathological stage (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P=0.001). The non-metformin-treated group was associated with a lower percentage of invasive ductal carcinoma (P=0.001) compared with the other two groups.  Conclusion  The non-metformin-treated group resulted in worse clinical outcomes in both subgroups compared with the metformin-treated group. Meanwhile, the non-diabetic group resulted in the worst prognosis among the three groups in the luminal B (high ki67) subgroup. These findings suggest that the choice of different anti-diabetic drugs may influence the prognosis of luminal B breast cancer patients with diabetes. 
Keywords:luminal B breast cancer  diabetes  metformin  prognosis
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国肿瘤临床》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国肿瘤临床》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号