首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的临床效果比较
引用本文:张利芳,唐真姿. 阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的临床效果比较[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2010, 38(3): 405-406. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3826.2010.03.029
作者姓名:张利芳  唐真姿
作者单位:1. 解放军国防科技大学医院,湖南,长沙,410073
2. 湖南省肿瘤医院,湖南,长沙,410013
摘    要:目的比较阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的临床效果。方法对2008年1月—2010年1月接受子宫切除术的120例临床资料进行分析,其中阴式子宫切除术60例,腹式子宫切除术60例,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间及住院时间。结果两组手术方法在手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间及住院时间等方面的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阴式子宫切除具有对患者损伤小,手术时间短,术中出血少,术后恢复快,住院时间短等优点,是临床值得推广的手术方式。

关 键 词:阴式子宫切除术  腹式子宫切除术  临床疗效

Comparison of clinical efficacy between vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy
Zhang Li-fang,Tang Zhen-zi. Comparison of clinical efficacy between vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy[J]. Clinical Journal of Medical Officer, 2010, 38(3): 405-406. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3826.2010.03.029
Authors:Zhang Li-fang  Tang Zhen-zi
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.Methods Patients,who underwent vaginal hysterectomy(n=60)and abdominal hysterectomy(n=60)from January 2008 to January 2010,were analyzed.Some indexes,such as operation time,bleeding volume,postoperative exhausting time and hospitalization time,were compared between the two groups.Results The above indexes were significantly different(P<0.05),which showed a better outcome for vaginal hysterectomy.Conclusion Vaginal hysterectomy is superior to abdominal hysterectomy in clinical surgery with less injury,shorter operation and hospitalization time,less bleeding volume,and faster postoperative recovery.
Keywords:vaginal hysterectomy  abdominal hysterectomy  clinical efficacy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号