首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

刍议《内经》与《周易》同源性
引用本文:蔡彦,揭西娜. 刍议《内经》与《周易》同源性[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2008, 26(2): 350-351
作者姓名:蔡彦  揭西娜
作者单位:广州中医药大学第一临床医学院,广东,广州,510405
摘    要:《周易》包括《易经》和《易传》,是中国古代哲学的一个源头和精髓,而《内经》则奠定了中医学理论及中医学的发展方向。针对目前中医学术界认为的"医易同源"结论提出质疑,从《内经》中较为重要的天人相应学说、阴阳学说、五行学说出发,与《周易》的学术思想一一对比,得出二者间存在较大差异,二者同源或许言过其实。

关 键 词:周易  内经  医易同源  刍议  内经  周易  同源性  Discrimination  Changes  差异  存在  学术思想  五行学说  阴阳学说  天人相应  医易同源  中医学术  方向  发展  中医学理论  精髓  源头  古代哲学
文章编号:1673-7717(2008)02-0350-02
修稿时间:2007-10-14

Discrimination on "Changes" and "Medicine"
CAI Yan,JIE Xi-na. Discrimination on "Changes" and "Medicine"[J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2008, 26(2): 350-351
Authors:CAI Yan  JIE Xi-na
Abstract:The Books of Changes is organically composed of the Text and the Commentaries.It is the headstream and distillation of ancient Chinese philosophy.On the other hand,Internal classic establishes the outline of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)'s.This paper suspects the theory of "Medicine and Changes sharing the same origin." It starts with comparing the primary contents in the Books of Changes with the three main theories in Internal Classics,namely,"relevant adaptation of the human body to natural environment","yin-yang theory"and "the theory of five elements",reaching the conclusion that there are lots of differences between these two books.As a result,it is not as convictive as we thought to allege that both the Books of Changes and Internal Classics share the same origin.
Keywords:the Books of Changes  Internal classics  Medicine and Changes sharing the same origin
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号