骨肉瘤患者综合护理干预效果评价研究

目的探讨综合护理干预对骨肉瘤患者心理状况及生存质量的影响c方法将120例骨肉瘤患者随机分为对照组和干预组，各60例，对照组给予常规护理，干预组给予综合护理干预；比较两组患者的满意度、焦虑、抑郁、生活质量等指标。结果实施综合护理干预后，干预俎的技术水平、健康教育、服务态度、心理支持、综合满意度等均明显高于对照组（P〈0．05）。干预前，干预组的SAS、SDS得分与对照组的差别均无统计学意义（P〉0.05）；干预岳，干预组的SAS、SDS得分均明显低于对照组（P〈0．01）。干预前，于预组的生活质量各维度指标与对照组比较差别无统计学意义（P〉0．05）：干预后，干预组的躯体功能、角色功能、情绪功能、认知功能、社会功能等维度指标得分均明显高于对照组（P〈0.01）。结论骨肉瘤患者实施综合护理干预，可提高患者满意度，缓解心理压力，提高生活质量。

Effect evaluation research on comprehensive nursing intervention of osteosarcoma patients

Objective To explore psychological status and life quality of comprehensive nursing intervention of osteosar- coma patients. Methods 120 cases of osteosarcoma were randomly divided into two groups such as control group and interven- tion group, respectively 60 cases. The control group was carried out normal nursing, and the intervention group was given com- prehensive nursing intervention. The satisfaction degree, anxiety, depression and life quality indexes were compared between the two groups. Results After cmnprehcnsive nursing intervention, technical level, health education, service attitude, psychologi- cal support and comprehensive satisfaction degree in the intervention group were much higher than the control group （ P〈0.05 ）. After intervention, SAS score and SDS score in the intervention group were much lower than the control group （ P〈0.01 ）, but no statistical significance between the two groups before intervention （P〉0.05）. The scores of physical function, role function, c- motion function, cognition function and society function in the intervention group were much higher than the control group （P〈 0.01）. But there was not statistical significance between the two groups before intervention （P〉0.05）. Conclusion Osteosar- coma patients carrying out comprehensive nursing intervention, it might raise satisfaction degree of patients, relieve mental stress and raise life quality.