Affiliation: | 1. University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium;2. Department of Neurosciences, Mind Body Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Department of Neurosciences, Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;3. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Health Psychology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;4. Department of Neurosciences, Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;5. Dutch Treatment Center Dialectical Behaviour Therapy, Harderwijk, The Netherlands;6. University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium Department of Neurosciences, Mind Body Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;7. Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Programme group Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
Abstract: | The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) proposed a dimensional approach to the assessment of personality disorders (PDs). Both models dictate that the clinician first determines PD severity before assessing maladaptive traits, invoking the level of personality functioning (LPF) construct. We consider LPF a promising dimensional construct for translational research because of its clinical importance and conceptual overlap with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Social Processes. We aim to identify biomarkers that co-vary with fluctuations in LPF in adulthood, ultimately to predict persistent decrease in LPF, associated with suicidality and morbidity. However, a theoretical framework to investigate stress-related oscillations in LPF is currently missing. In this article, we aim to fill this hiatus with a critical review about stress and LPF. First, we discuss acute stress and LPF. We briefly present the basics of the neurophysiological stress response and review the literature on momentary and daily fluctuations in LPF, both at a subjective and physiological level. Second, we review the effects of chronic stress on brain function and social behaviour and recapitulate the main findings from prospective cohort studies. This review underlies our suggestions for multimethod assessment of stress-related oscillations in LPF and our theoretical framework for future longitudinal studies, in particular studies using the experience sampling method (ESM). |