首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The best and worst of times in therapy development for myasthenia gravis
Authors:Michael Benatar MD  PhD  Gary Cutter PhD  Henry J. Kaminski MD
Affiliation:1. Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida;2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing - review & editing;3. Department of Neurology & Rehabilitation Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC

Abstract:Within the last 5 years, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved complement and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRN) inhibitors for treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis, and several other therapies are in late-stage clinical trials or under regulatory review. However, questions about which patients are most likely to benefit from which therapies, and the relative effectiveness of these very expensive drugs, has resulted in uncertainty around the place that they should occupy in the existing therapeutic armamentarium. MGNet (a Rare Diseases Clinical Research Consortium funded by the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke) held two meetings during the 14th International Conference of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America to discuss the most critical needs for clinical trial readiness and biomarker development in the context of therapy development for myasthenia gravis. Herein we provide a summary of these discussions, but not a consensus opinion, and offer a series of recommendations to guide focused research in the most critical areas. We welcome ongoing discussion through comments on this work.
Keywords:clinical trials  myasthenia gravis  Myasthenia Gravis---Activities of Daily Living  outcome measures  quantitative myasthenia gravis score
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号