首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

机械通气患者肠内营养不同管饲方式的比较
引用本文:杨小敏. 机械通气患者肠内营养不同管饲方式的比较[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2005, 20(8): 688-689
作者姓名:杨小敏
作者单位:广西医科大学第一附属医院麻醉科,广西,南宁,530021
摘    要:目的探讨机械通气患者用持续管饲法和间歇管饲法两种肠内营养支持方式的优点。方法将53例接受机械通气患者随机分为持续管饲组(20例)和间歇管饲组(33例)。观察并比较这两种管饲方式引起的呕吐、返流、腹泻的发生情况。结果持续管饲组中呕吐、返流和腹泻发生频率均显著高于间歇管饲组(P〈0.001)。结论对接受机械通气的患者进行肠内营养支持时,采用间歇管饲对减少胃肠道不良反应明显优于持续管饲。

关 键 词:肠内营养  机械通气  胃肠功能
文章编号:1002-6975(2005)08-0688-02
收稿时间:2005-03-16
修稿时间:2005-03-16

Comparison of different kinds of tube feeding of inner intestinal nutrition for patient with mechanical ventilation
Yang Xiaomin. Comparison of different kinds of tube feeding of inner intestinal nutrition for patient with mechanical ventilation[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2005, 20(8): 688-689
Authors:Yang Xiaomin
Abstract:Objective To explore the advantage of two kinds of inner intestinal nutrition, continuous tuber feeding and interval tuber feeding, for patients with mechanical ventilation.Method 53 patients with mechanical ventilation were randomly divided into continuous tuber feeding group (20 cases) and interval tuber feeding group (13 cases). The occurrence of vomiting, diarrhea and counter flow caused by the two kinds of tuber feeding method were observed and compared between the two groups.Result The occurrence rate of vomiting, diarrhea and counter flow in continuous tuber feeding group were significantly higher than that of interval tuber feeding group (P<0.001).Conclusion The interval tuber feeding is more effective in reducing gastric intestinal side effect than continuous tuber feeding for patients with mechanical ventilation..
Keywords:Inner intestinal nutrition Mechanical ventilation Gastric-intestinal function
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号