首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Impact of adverse events of bevacizumab on survival outcomes of patients with recurrent glioblastoma
Affiliation:1. Department of Neurosurgery/Neuro-oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China;2. Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China;3. Department of Imaging and Minimally Invasive Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China;4. Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China;5. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China;6. Department of Neurosurgery, Xuzhou Medical College Hospital, 99 West Huaihai Road, Xuzhou 221000, China;1. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, United States;2. Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, 85 Seymour Street, Suite 227, Hartford, CT 06106, United States
Abstract:BackgroundBevacizumab is widely used for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). It is well known that adverse events (AEs) due to bevacizumab can cause early discontinuation of treatment. However, the association between AEs and survival outcomes is not well defined.MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with rGB, who were treated with single-agent bevacizumab or bevacizumab-based combination regimens from 07/2005 through 07/2014, and who discontinued bevacizumab due to either AEs or physician’s decision. Those who discontinued bevacizumab because of tumor progression were excluded. Demographic, treatment, and survival data were collected from the database.ResultsOf 298 adults with rGB treated with bevacizumab in our database, 65 patients discontinued bevacizumab due to AEs (n = 39, 60%) or physician’s decision (n = 26, 40%). There were no statistically significant differences in regards to age, performance status, extent of resection, number of lesions, the time between diagnosis and first recurrence, time between diagnosis and initiation of bevacizumab, number of recurrences before bevacizumab initiation, and duration of bevacizumab treatment between the two groups. Interestingly, patients who discontinued bevacizumab because of AEs progressed earlier after bevacizumab discontinuation (3.9 months vs 5.7 months; p = 0.02), had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (10.4 months vs 14.2 months; p = 0.01) and shorter overall survival (OS) from bevacizumab initiation (13.9 months vs 32.5 months; p = 0.01) as well as shorter OS from tumor diagnosis (20 months vs 49.3 months; p = 0.007) when compared to patients who discontinued bevacizumab due to a physician’s decision.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the development of AEs to bevacizumab or bevacizumab-containing regimens is associated with unfavorable glioma-related survival outcomes in patients with rGB.
Keywords:Bevacizumab  Adverse events  Physician’s decision  Recurrent glioblastoma  Survival
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号