首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

社区不同高血压管理模式对患者血压控制的影响
引用本文:蔡敏章,马明辉,刘来新,者炜,关玉梅,杨莉. 社区不同高血压管理模式对患者血压控制的影响[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2017, 10(12): 49-53
作者姓名:蔡敏章  马明辉  刘来新  者炜  关玉梅  杨莉
作者单位:北京大学公共卫生学院(北京大学医学部卫生政策与技术评估中心) 北京 100191
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(71273016;71673004)
摘    要:目的:研究不同高血压管理模式对高血压患者血压控制效果的影响。方法:选取新疆某县城区采取不同高血压管理模式的三家社区卫生服务中心,其中A机构开展基本公共卫生服务,不提供医疗服务;B机构提供基本公共卫生服务和医疗服务,并建立高血压责任医生制度;C机构基于区域医联体开展基本公共卫生服务和医疗服务。本研究于2013年7月和2015年12月调查三家社区卫生服务中心高血压患者的血压控制情况,运用Logistic回归对高血压管理效果进行分析。结果:A机构患者平均收缩压上升0.89mmHg(P0.05),平均舒张压上升0.67mmHg(P0.05),血压控制率下降2.54%(P0.05);B机构患者平均收缩压上升5.31mmHg(P0.01),平均舒张压下降1.70mmHg(P0.05),血压控制率提高2.70%(P0.05);C机构患者平均收缩压下降1.54mmHg(P0.05),平均舒张压下降2.97mmHg(P0.01),血压控制率提高16.24%(P0.05)。根据随机效应模型结果,从基线调查到结局调查,A机构患者血压控制的概率为C机构的0.27倍(P0.05),B机构患者血压控制的概率为C机构的0.41倍(P0.05)。结论:基于区域医联体的高血压管理模式可有效控制患者血压。

关 键 词:高血压  血压控制  前后比较研究
收稿时间:2017-03-29
修稿时间:2017-05-04

Effects of different modes of hypertension management on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension
CAI Min-zhang,MA Ming-hui,LIU Lai-xin,ZHE Wei,GUAN Yu-mei,YANG Li. Effects of different modes of hypertension management on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2017, 10(12): 49-53
Authors:CAI Min-zhang  MA Ming-hui  LIU Lai-xin  ZHE Wei  GUAN Yu-mei  YANG Li
Affiliation:School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
Abstract:Objective:To study the effect of different hypertension management modes on the blood pressure control in patients with hypertension. Methods:Three community health service centers in Xinjiang city were included in the study, which used different modes of hypertension management. Center A carried out the basic public health services, but did not provide medical services; Center B provided both the basic public health services and medical services, Center B also established the responsible doctor system; Center C carried out basic public health services and provided medical services based on the regional medical association. The blood pressure of patients with hypertension from the three centers were investigated in July 2013 and in December 2015. Using Logistic regression to analyze the effect of different management modes on blood pressure control. Results:The average SBP of patients from Center A increased by 0.89mmHg (P>0.05), the average BP increased by 0.67mmHg (P>0.05), the blood pressure control rate decreased by 2.54% (P>0.05); The average SBP of patients from Center B increased by 5.31mmHg (P<0.01), the average BP decreased by 1.70mmHg (P>0.05), the blood pressure control rate increased by 2.70% (P>0.05); The average SBP of patients from Center C decreased by 1.54mmHg (P>0.05), the average BP decreased by 2.97mmHg (P<0.01), the blood pressure control rate increased by 16.24% (P<0.05).According to the results of the random effect model, the likelihood of blood control of Center A is 0.27 times that of Center C (P<0.05), the likelihood of blood control of Center B is 0.41 times that of Center C (P>0.05). Conclusion:the hypertension management mode based on regional medical association can effectively control the blood pressure of patients with hypertension.
Keywords:Hypertension  Hypertension control  Before and after study
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国卫生政策研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国卫生政策研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号