首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

洛美沙星与环丙沙星治疗急性细菌性感染疗效比较
引用本文:赖连枪,温预关.洛美沙星与环丙沙星治疗急性细菌性感染疗效比较[J].医药导报,2002,21(11):714-715.
作者姓名:赖连枪  温预关
作者单位:1. 深圳市龙岗区中心医院外科,518112
2. 广州市脑科医院,510170
摘    要:目的:比较洛美沙星与环丙沙星治疗急性细菌性感染的临床疗效和安全性.方法:144例患者随机分成两组,治疗组72例,用洛美沙星注射液0.2~0.4 g,iv,qd,疗程7~10 d;对照组72例,用环丙沙星注射液0.2~0.4 g,iv,bid,疗程7~10 d.结果:总有效率、致病菌清除率治疗组分别为88.9%,86.1%,对照组分别为84.7%,80.6%,不良反应的发生率治疗组和对照组分别为5.6%,6.9%.结论:洛美沙星是一个安全、有效的抗菌药物.洛美沙星比环丙沙星给药方便.

关 键 词:洛美沙星  环丙沙星  感染  细菌性
文章编号:1004-0781(2002)11-0714-02
修稿时间:2001年6月25日

Effective Comparison of Lomefloxacin and Ciprofloxacin in Tre ating Acute Bacterial Infection
LAI Lian qiang ,WEN Yu guan.Effective Comparison of Lomefloxacin and Ciprofloxacin in Tre ating Acute Bacterial Infection[J].Herald of Medicine,2002,21(11):714-715.
Authors:LAI Lian qiang  WEN Yu guan
Institution:LAI Lian qiang 1,WEN Yu guan 2
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lomefloxacin injection and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. Methods:A total of 144 patients were divided into 2 groups. 72 patients of the therapy group received lomefloxacin injection 0.2-0.4 g, iv grip, qd, for 7-10 d. 72 patients of the control group received ciprofloxacin injection 0.2- 0.4 g, iv grip, bid, for 7-10 d. Results:The effective rate and the bacterial clearing rate of the therapy group were 88.9% and 86.1 % respectively, and those of the control group were 84.7% and 80.6% respectively. The adverse reaction of the therapy group was 5.6% , and that of the control group was 6.9%. Conclusion: Lomefloxacin is an effective and safe antibacterial drug in the treatment of bacterial infections. The usage of lomefloxacin injection is convenienter than ciprofloxacin's.
Keywords:Lomefloxacin  Ciprofloxacin  Bacterial infections
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《医药导报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《医药导报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号