首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中西医结合治疗胃癌肝转移疗效分析
引用本文:颜廷华,孙军,谷文龙,俞进友,朱建军. 中西医结合治疗胃癌肝转移疗效分析[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2013, 0(12): 2542-2544
作者姓名:颜廷华  孙军  谷文龙  俞进友  朱建军
作者单位:建湖县人民医院肿瘤诊治中心,江苏建湖224700
摘    要:目的:评价肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合全身静脉化疗治疗胃癌肝转移的疗效及其影响因素。方法:回顾分析2006年5月—2012年7月在本科接受TACE联合全身静脉化疗的胃癌肝转移病例51例,所有病例先行13周期全身静脉化疗(EOF方案或TOF方案),化疗期间患者同时接受参麦注射液静脉滴注,化疗结束后33周期全身静脉化疗(EOF方案或TOF方案),化疗期间患者同时接受参麦注射液静脉滴注,化疗结束后34周行肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗。结果:所有病例接受TACE联合全身静脉化疗,客观有效率62.0%,获益率78.4%。单纯肝转移客观有效率、1年生存率分别为85.0%、80.0%,合并肝外转移组分别是46.9%、54.8%,单纯肝转移组高于合并肝外转移组(P<0.05)。单发或孤立性肝转移组客观有效率、1年生存率分别为83.3%、88.9%,多发肝转移组分别是51.5%、51.5%,单发或孤立性肝转移组高于多发肝转移组(P<0.05)。富血供型客观有效率、1年生存率分别为86.4%、92.3%,少血供型客观有效率、1年生存率分别为55.3%,55.2%,富血供型高于少血供型(P<0.05)。结论:TACE联合全身静脉化疗治疗胃癌肝转移有较高的客观有效率,尤以单发或孤立性肝转移、不合并肝外转移、DSA造影富血供型疗效更好。

关 键 词:胃癌  胃癌肝转移  介入治疗  化疗  联合  参麦注射液

Integrative Medicine Clinical analysis of gastric cancer metastasis
Yan tinghua,SUN Jun,GU Wenlong,YU Jinyou,ZHU Jianjun. Integrative Medicine Clinical analysis of gastric cancer metastasis[J]. Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2013, 0(12): 2542-2544
Authors:Yan tinghua  SUN Jun  GU Wenlong  YU Jinyou  ZHU Jianjun
Affiliation:( Cancer Treatment Center, Jiangsu Province People Hospital, JianHuXian Jianhu, 224700, Jiangsu, China)
Abstract:Objective :To evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with systemic intrave nous chemotherapy on liver metastasis of gastric cancer and its influencing factors. Methods:From May 2006 to July 2012,51 cases gastric cancer with liver metastases patients which accepted TACE combined with systemic chemotherapy treatment were retro spective analysised. All patients received 1 3 cycles prior systemic chemotherapy ( EOF programs or TOF program), during chemotherapy,patients received intravenous infusion of Shenmai Zhusheye, 3 4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE)therapy. Results:All patients received TACE combined with systemic chemothera py,objective response rate was 62.0% ,benefit rate was 78.4% . The objective response rate and 1 year survival rates of the patients with liver metastases alone were 85.0 % ,80.0%, which were higher the theextrahepatic metastasis patients which were 46. 9% and 54. 8 % (P 〈 0. 05 ). The objective response rate, 1 year survival rates of single or isolated liver metastasis were 83. 3 % and 88.9% , they were higher than the Multiple liver metastases patients which were 51.5% ,51.5 % (P 〈 0. 05 ). The objec tive resnonse rate and 1 year survival rates of the rich:blood suDnlv tvDe oatients were 86.4% .92.3% . they were hiher thanthe less blood supply type patients Whichwere 55.3% , 55.2% (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion:TACE combined with systemic chemother apy treatment on gastric cancer liver metastases have a higher objective response rate, especially on single or isolated liver metas tases without extrahepatic metastasis, DSA angiography rich blood supply type patoents.
Keywords:Gastric cancer  cancer liver metastases  intervention  chemotherapy  joint  Shenmai Zhusheye
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号