Conformational investigation of αβ-dehydropeptides

Solution conformations of three series of model peptides, homochiral Ac-Pro-L-Xaa-NHCH₃ and heterochiral Ac-Pro-D-Xaa-NHcH₃ (Xaa = Val, Phe, Leu, Abu. Ah) as well as αβ-unsaturated Ac-Pro-ΔXaa-NHCH₃ Δ Xaa =ΔVal, (Z)-ΔPhe, (Z)-ΔLeu, (Z)-ΔAbu] were investigated in CDCl₃ and CH₂Cl₂ by ¹H-, ¹³C-NMR, and FTIR spectroscopy. NH stretching absorption spectra, solvent shifts Δδ for NH (Xaa) and NHCH₃ on going from CDCl₃ to (CD₃)₂SO, diagnostic interresidue proton NOEs, and trans-cis isomer ratios were examined. These studies performed showed the essential difference in conformational propensities between homochiral peptides (L-Xaa) on the one hand and heterochiral (D-Xaa) and αβ-dehydropeptides (ΔXaa) on the other. Former compounds are conformationally flexible with an inverse γ-bend, a β-turn, and open forms in an equilibrium depending on the nature of the Xaa side chain. Conformational preferences of heterochiral and αβ-dehydropeptides are very similar, with the type-II β-turn as the dominating structure. There is no apparent correlation between conformational properties and the nature of the Xaa side chain within the two groups. The β-turn formation propensity seems to be somewhat greater in αβ-unsaturated than in heterochiral peptides, but an estimation of β-folded conformers is risky.