首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

一种患者防护口罩在牙周洁治时防喷溅效果的仿真研究
引用本文:谭瑶,张娟,李永亮,侯晓玫,帅婷. 一种患者防护口罩在牙周洁治时防喷溅效果的仿真研究[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2020, 19(8): 741-744. DOI: 10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20207158
作者姓名:谭瑶  张娟  李永亮  侯晓玫  帅婷
作者单位:1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院第二门诊部, 北京 100101;2. 广州市荔湾区口腔医院修复科, 广东 广州 510170
摘    要: 目的 评价患者防护口罩在牙周洁治时对口腔喷溅物的防护效果。方法 设计一种新型患者防护口罩,在口腔门诊诊室内采用仿真人模拟牙周超声洁治治疗,按洁牙位置及防溅措施分成六组(第一组为右上切牙弱吸,第二组为右上切牙弱吸+强吸,第三组为右上切牙弱吸+新型患者防护口罩,第四组为右下切牙弱吸,第五组为右下切牙弱吸+强吸,第六组为右下切牙弱吸+新型患者防护口罩),比较各组牙周洁治时口腔喷溅物的喷溅距离及喷溅面积所占百分比。结果 第三组和第六组(使用弱吸+新型患者防护口罩)无论是右上切牙还是右下切牙洁治,白纸上的喷溅距离和喷溅面积所占百分比均为0,而第一组、第二组、第四组、第五组(单纯使用弱负压吸唾或者结合强负压吸唾)均可见一定喷溅距离,喷溅面积百分比为(1.34±0.56)%~(24.48±7.43)%。结论 新型患者防护口罩可有效防护牙周洁治时口腔喷溅物的喷溅。

关 键 词:防护口罩  超声洁治  仿真人模拟  喷溅物  医院感染  
收稿时间:2020-04-15

Effect of protective mask against splashes during simulated periodontal scaling
TAN Yao,ZHANG Juan,LI Yong-liang,HOU Xiao-mei,SHUAI Ting. Effect of protective mask against splashes during simulated periodontal scaling[J]. Chinese Journal of Infection Control, 2020, 19(8): 741-744. DOI: 10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20207158
Authors:TAN Yao  ZHANG Juan  LI Yong-liang  HOU Xiao-mei  SHUAI Ting
Affiliation:1. Second Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100101, China;2. Department of Prosthodontics, Stomatological Hospital of Liwan District of Guangzhou City, Guangzhou 510170, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the protective effect of patient''s protective mask on oral spray during periodontal scaling. Methods Ultrasonic scaling was simulated by simulated human in dental clinic to test the protective effect of a new protective mask for patients. The test was divided into six groups according to the teeth position and protective methods(group 1: Upper right anterior teeth + low volume saliva ejector; group 2: Upper right anterior teeth + low volume saliva ejector+ high volume saliva ejector; group 3: Upper right anterior teeth + low volume saliva ejector + new protective mask; group 4: Lower right anterior teeth + low volume saliva ejector; group 5: Lower right anterior teeth + low volume saliva ejector+ high volume saliva ejector; group 6: Lower right anterior teeth + low volume saliva ejector + new protective mask). The spattering range and percentage of spattering area during simulated ultrasonic scaling among groups were compared. Results The spattering range and the percentage of spattering area on white paper were both 0 in group 3 and group 6 (using low volume saliva ejector + new protective mask, whether it was upper right anterior teeth or lower right anterior teeth), while group 1, 2, 4 and 5 (only use low volume saliva ejector or combined with high volume saliva ejector) produced spatter of certain range, and percentage of spattering area were (1.34±0.56)%-(24.48±7.43)%. Conclusion The new protective mask can effectively stop oral spattering during ultrasonic scaling.
Keywords:protective mask|ultrasonic scaling|simulation by simulated human|spatter|healthcare-associated infection
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国感染控制杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国感染控制杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号