首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

门冬胰岛素30与口服降糖药治疗2型糖尿病的成本-效果分析
引用本文:李晔萍,郭连宇.门冬胰岛素30与口服降糖药治疗2型糖尿病的成本-效果分析[J].中国药师,2010,13(3):413-414.
作者姓名:李晔萍  郭连宇
作者单位:卫生部及天津市激素与发育重点实验室,天津医科大学代谢病医院,天津,300070
摘    要:目的:探讨门冬胰岛素30与口服降糖药治疗2型糖尿病的经济效果。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,选择165例2型糖尿病患者,随机分为3组(A组:门冬胰岛素30;B组:二甲双胍肠溶胶囊+格列美脲片+阿卡波糖片;C组:二甲双胍片+格列关脲片+瑞格列奈片)进行评价。结果:A、B、C3组成本分别为140.80,141.82,251.72元,总有效率分别为87.93%,79.25%,83.33%(P〉0.05),成本-效果比分别为1.60,1.79,3.02。结论:A组优于B和C组。

关 键 词:门冬胰岛素30  口服降糖药  2型糖尿病  成本-效果分析

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of NovoMix30FlexPen vs.Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Li Yeping,Guo Lianyu.Cost-effectiveness Analysis of NovoMix30FlexPen vs.Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[J].China Pharmacist,2010,13(3):413-414.
Authors:Li Yeping  Guo Lianyu
Institution:(Key Lab of Hormone and Development, Metabolic Disease Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China)
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NovoMix30FlexPen (Insulin-aspartate30) vs. oral hypoglycemic drugs on Type 2 diabetes meilitus. Method: A retrospective study was conducted in which a total of 165 cases with type 2 diabetes meilitus were devided into 3 group by random( A : NovoMix30FlexPen ; B : Mefformin Hydrochloride Enteric-coated Capsules + Glimepiride Tab- lets + Acarbose Tablets ; C : Mefformin Hydrocldoride Tablets + Glimepiride Tablets + Repaglinide Tablets) to be compared. Result: The cost was 140. 80 yuan in Group A versus 141.82 yuan in Group B vs. 251, 72 yuan in Group C; the total effective rates were 87. 93% versus 79. 25% versus 83.33% (P 〉0. 05) and the cost-effectiveness ratios were 1.60,1.79 and 3.02 respectively. Conclusion: Group A is superior to B and C groups for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Keywords:Novo3OFlexPen  Oral hypoglyeemic drug  Type 2 diabetes mellitus  Cost-effectiveness analysis
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号