首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A Rights-Based Approach for Service Providers to Measure the Quality of Life of Children with a Disability
Authors:Elise Davis  Dana Young  Kim-Michelle Gilson  Elena Swift  Jeffrey Chan  Lisa Gibbs  Utsana Tonmukayakul  Dinah Reddihough  Katrina Williams
Affiliation:1. Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;2. Neurodevelopment and Disability, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;3. MINDS, Singapore, Singapore;4. Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;5. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;6. Developmental Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Abstract:

Background

This paper identifies the best instruments for service providers to measure the quality of life (QoL) of children with a disability, with a focus on their alignment with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with a Disability (CRPD).

Methods

This study reviewed systematic reviews to identify generic QoL instruments for children and adolescents, followed by an appraisal process using newly developed criteria. QoL instruments with a health status, functioning, and condition-specific focus were excluded.

Results

Twenty generic QoL instruments for children were identified from existing systematic reviews to undergo further review. Only 2 of the 20 instruments were recommended for service providers to measure the QoL of children with a disability (KIDSCREEN and KINDL). Many pediatric QoL instruments (N = 9) focus on functioning and are not consistent with the CRPD, confounding a child’s functioning with their feelings about their life. KIDSCREEN and KINDL have self-report and parent report versions, are applicable for childhood and adolescence, demonstrate adequate reliability and validity, involved children in their development, focus on wellbeing, are likely to be able to be completed by a child with a disability, and are low in cost.

Conclusions

Many instruments focus on functioning rather than wellbeing and thus may not capture the QoL of children with a disability. A child’s functional limitations may not be consistent with their feelings about life. Two instruments that assess wellbeing and meet the criteria important for service providers now require further testing to explore their usefulness and validity for children with varying abilities.
Keywords:child disability  Convention on the Rights of Persons with a Disability  disability service provider  generic instruments  quality of life  wellbeing
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号