首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究唑尼沙胺添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性
引用本文:吴逊,吴立文,王玉平,洪震,赵忠新,黄远桂,周东,王学峰. 随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究唑尼沙胺添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2010, 43(7). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2010.07.002
作者姓名:吴逊  吴立文  王玉平  洪震  赵忠新  黄远桂  周东  王学峰
作者单位:1. 北京大学第一医院神经内科,100034
2. 中国医学科学院北京协和医院神经内科
3. 首都医科大学北京宣武医院神经内科
4. 复旦大学附属华山医院神经内科
5. 上海第二军医大学附属长征医院神经内科
6. 第四军医大学附属西京医院神经内科
7. 四川大学华西医院神经内科
8. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经内科
摘    要:目的 评价唑尼沙胺(ZNS)作为添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性.方法 采用多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、添加治疗设计.240例确诊为癫(癎)部分性发作的受试者按照1:1的比例随机分配到ZNS治疗组或安慰剂组.在前4周加鼋期内受试者自100 mg/d逐渐加量至300 mg/d,随后进入12周的稳定治疗期.在稳定期内可根据患者情况酌情减量,或加量至最大剂量400 mg/d.有效性评价的主要指标为稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线值减少百分数的中位值,重要的次要评价指标为有效率,即部分性癫(癎)发作次数减少≥50%者的比例.同时对药物的安全性进行评价.结果 ZNS组受试者稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线期减少百分数(48.4%)显著高于安慰剂组(26.6%),组间差异有统计学意义(F=4.904,P=0.028);ZNS组治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效率(48.6%)高于安慰剂组(34.9%),差异有统计学意义(X2=4.046,P=0.044),其中以复杂部分性癫(癎)的组间差异最为显著(分别为52.2%和33.3%,X2=5.607,P=0.018).ZNS组与安慰剂组不良事件发生率相当,与ZNS相关的不良事件多为头晕、头痛、嗜睡、食欲下降、恶心等.结论 ZNS能有效治疗部分性癫(癎),降低癫(癎)发作频率,对复杂部分性癫(癎)发作治疗效果尤为突出.ZNS耐受性良好,受试者用药安全性较高.

关 键 词:癫(癎),部分性  异(噁)唑类  随机对照试验

A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled,multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zonisamide as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory partial seizures
WU Xun,WU Li-wen,WANG Yu-ping,HONG Zhen,ZHAO Zhong-xin,HUANG Yuan-gui,ZHOU Dong,WANG Xue-feng. A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled,multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zonisamide as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory partial seizures[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurology, 2010, 43(7). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2010.07.002
Authors:WU Xun  WU Li-wen  WANG Yu-ping  HONG Zhen  ZHAO Zhong-xin  HUANG Yuan-gui  ZHOU Dong  WANG Xue-feng
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Zonisamide(ZNS) as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures receiving other antiepileptic drags (AEDs).Methods This was a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled study conducted at multi-centers.All 240 subjects were randomized to either the ZNS group or the placebo group in a 1:1 ratio.The double-blind treatment phase included a titration phase during which zonisamide dose inereased from 100 mg/day to 300 mg/day over 4 weeks and then a 12-week fixed-dose phase.The primary efficacy endpoint was,the median % reduction from baseline in all pattial seizure frequency(CPS+SPS+SGS)during the fixed-dose phase.The important secondaw endpoint wag the responder rate.Safety profiles and tolerance were also evaluated.Results The FAS analysis showed the median reduction from baseline in the ZNS group was greater than in the placebo group(48.4%vs 26.6%),the difference was significant for ZNS compared with placebo(F=4.904,P=0.028);The responder rates for all partial seizures(48.6%vs34.9%,X2=4.046,P=0.044)and for complex seizures(52.2% vs 33.3%,X2=5.607,P=0.018)were significantly higber in the ZNS group than in the placebo group in the FAS population.The overall adverse events(AEs)profile was comparable between the two groups.The most frequent AEs considered to be related to zonisamide by the investigator were headache,dizziness,somnolence,anorexia,nausea,etc.Conclusions ZNS is superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of partial seizures and well-tolerated.ZNS could be a choice of adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures.
Keywords:Epilepsies,partial  Isoxazoles  Randomized controlled trial
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号