首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同血液净化方法治疗重症急性肾衰
引用本文:丁凌,杨莹. 不同血液净化方法治疗重症急性肾衰[J]. 中国现代医生, 2012, 50(22): 26-27
作者姓名:丁凌  杨莹
作者单位:杭州市第三人民医院重症医学科
摘    要:目的探讨不同血液净化方法治疗重症急性肾衰的效果。方法选择我院收治的重症急性肾衰患者60例.按顺序分为i组:A组采取日间连续性静脉一静脉血液滤过法(CVVHD),B组采取连续性静脉一静脉血液滤过法(CVVH),C组采取连续性静脉一静脉血液透析滤过法(CVVDHF),比较血肌酐、尿素氮、二氧化碳结合力水平,统计肾功能恢复情况及平均每日费用等。结果净化后,三组肾功能、血液的血肌酐、尿素氮、二氧化碳结合力水平无明显差异(P〉0.05);但B、C组费用明显高于A组(P〈0.05)。结论CVVDHF与CVVH均效果良好;CVVHD更经济。

关 键 词:血液净化方法  重症急性肾衰

The different blood purification treatment for severe acute renal failure
DING Ling,YANG Ying. The different blood purification treatment for severe acute renal failure[J]. , 2012, 50(22): 26-27
Authors:DING Ling  YANG Ying
Affiliation:Department of Critical Care Medicine of Hangzhou Third People’s Hospital,Hangzhou 310004,China
Abstract:Objective To discuss the different blood purification treatment clinical effect for severe acute renal failure.Methods Sixty patients who had severe acute renal failure were chosen for the research.Patients in group A were treated by CVVHD;Patients in group B were treated by CVVH and patients in group C were treated by CVVDHF.There was a comprehensive comparison about serum creatinine,urea nitrogen and carbon dioxide-combining power for all groups’ patients.The treatment effect and dialysis costs of all groups were calculated and an investigation was done.Results The data of serum creatinine,urea nitrogen and carbon dioxide-combining power for all groups’ patients did not have obvious differences and the treatment effect of all groups was also nearly the same.But the dialysis costs of group B and C was much more expensive than that of group A.Conclusion Both CVVH and CVVDHF have obvious treatment effects for severe acute renal failure,but CVVHD is cheaper.
Keywords:Blood purification  Severe acute renal failure
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号