Systematic review and meta-analysis of the additional benefit of local prophylactic antibiotic therapy for infection rates in open tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing |
| |
Authors: | Joyce Craig Thomas Fuchs Michelle Jenks Kelly Fleetwood Dominik Franz Joel Iff Michael Raschke |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, YO10 5NH, UK 2. Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Waldeyerstrasse 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany 3. Quantics Consulting Ltd, Hudson House, 8 Albany Street, Edinburgh, EH1 3QB, UK 4. Department of Medical Management/Medical Controlling, DRG-Research-Group, University Hospital Muenster, Domagkstrasse 20, 48149, Muenster, Germany 5. Synthes GmbH, Luzernstrasse 21, 4528, Zuchwil, Switzerland
|
| |
Abstract: | Purpose This analysis compared the rate of deep wound infections in patients with open tibia fractures, treated with intramedullary nails, receiving additional locally-delivered antibiotics to those receiving standard care. Methods Two systematic literature searches identified studies reporting infection rates in patients treated with intramedullary nails for tibia fractures receiving systemic antibiotics only (search one) and in patients receiving adjunctive locally-administered antibiotics peri-operatively at the tissue-implant interface (search two). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 and seven papers from searches one and two, respectively, were included in meta-analyses. Results The absolute rate of infection was lower for all Gustilo-Anderson grades of tibia fractures when local antibiotics were administered as adjunctive prophylactic therapy. For severe fractures, classified as GAIII fractures, patients receiving systemic antibiotics only had an infection rate of 14.4 % [95 % CI: 10.5 %, 18.5 %]; adding local antibiotics reduced the rate to 2.4 % [0.0 %, 9.4 %], with an odds ratio of 0.17. Risk of deep wound infections increased with severity of fracture, rising to over 31 % in GIIIB&C fractures for patients receiving systematic antibiotics only, but to below 9 % with additional local antibiotics. Conclusion The findings support consideration of augmenting the antibiotic prophylaxis regimen to include locally-delivered antibiotics. Patients with severe fractures will obtain greatest benefit from infections avoided. No trial directly compared the two treatments for open tibia fractures, limiting the ability to attribute the differences in observed infection rates directly to the treatments themselves. A large comparative study to improve the evidence on relative effect size is merited. Level of evidence: Level III. |
| |
Keywords: | Tibia fracture Local antibiotics Infection |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|